Icono govco
 

Publicación:
Efecto del enriquecimiento ambiental sobre la ganancia de peso y la relación humano-animal en bovinos en pastoreo

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorVargas Angel, Gino Odairspa
dc.contributor.authorJaramillo-Hernández , Dumar Alexanderspa
dc.contributor.authorMainau Brunsó, Evaspa
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-13T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available2024-09-13T00:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-13
dc.description.abstractLos bovinos en pastoreo extensivo del trópico bajo sobreviven a limitantes nutricionales, de salud y de bienestar, las cuales desafían constantemente la capacidad humana para brindarles planes de mejoramiento capaces de generar adaptabilidad al contexto productivo, disminuyendo las adversidades de un entorno ambiental y social. El objetivo de esta investigación fue analizar los tiempos de interacción y preferencia de los elementos de enriquecimiento ambiental, la relación humano-animal y ganancia de peso de bovinos en pastoreo del trópico bajo. Para ello, se utilizaron 26 bovinos que pastan en sistemas extensivos naturales, divididos al azar y aleatoriamente en dos grupos: el primero denominado G1C control, en el cual fue inexistente el uso de elementos de enriquecimiento ambiental en las áreas de pastoreo. Por otro lado, el grupo dos denominado G2EA, al cual se integraba durante una hora (9:00 am a 10:00 am) un ambiente modificado enriquecido con llantas, cepillos comerciales y cepillos artesanales. Los animales fueron evaluados por veinte horas durante cuatro semanas. En estas observaciones se valoraron los tiempos de contacto físico e interacción con los elementos enriquecidos, la relación humano-animal a través de 5 test Welfare Quality de miedo aproximación-evasión y la ganancia de peso durante el ensayo. Los datos fueron analizados con el programa estadístico SAS® versión 9.4. Se identificó que el enriquecimiento ambiental tuvo efectos comportamentales significativos en algunas de las variables analizadas como la relación humano-animal, siendo el grupo G2EA el que presentó mayores porcentajes de animales que permitieron un afianzamiento positivo. La interacción con los elementos de enriquecimiento que captó mayor porcentaje de uso fue el cepillo comercial estático. El enriquecimiento ambiental otorga a los bovinos de este experimento efectos beneficiosos de la relación humano-animal y efectos positivos para la ganancia de peso. Es necesario llevar a cabo más estudios, con un mayor número de animales de diferentes grupos etarios y técnicas productivas, probando diferentes ambientes modificados.spa
dc.description.abstractCattle in extensive grazing in the low tropics survive different nutritional, health and well-being limitations, which constantly challenge human capacity to provide them with improvement plans capable of generating adaptability to the productive context, reducing the adversities of an environmental and social environment. The objective of this research was to analyze the interaction times and preference of environmental enrichment elements, the human-animal relationship and weight gain of grazing cattle in the low tropics. For this, 26 cattle were used, which graze in natural extensive systems, randomly divided into two groups, the first called G1C control, in which elements of environmental enrichment were non-existent in the grazing areas. On the other hand, group two called G2EA, which was integrated for one hour (9:00 am to 10:00 am) in a modified environment enriched with tires, commercial brushes and handmade brushes. The animals were evaluated for 20 hours for 4 weeks. In these observations, the times of physical contact and interaction with the enriched elements, the human-animal relationship were assessed through 5 Welfare Quality tests of approach-avoidance fear and weight gain during the test. The data were analyzed with the statistical program SAS® Software, version 9.4. It was identified that environmental enrichment had significant behavioral effects on some of the variables analyzed such as the human-animal relationship, with the G2EA group being the one that presented the highest percentages of animals that allowed positive consolidation. The interaction with the enrichment elements that captured the highest percentage of use was the static commercial brush. Environmental enrichment gives the cattle in this experiment beneficial effects of the human-animal relationship, positive effects for weight gain. It is necessary to carry out more studies, with a greater number of animals of different age groups and production techniques, testing different modified environments.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doi10.22579/22484817.1142
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4817
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.22579/22484817.1142
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de los Llanosspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/sistemasagroecologicos/article/download/1142/1138
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 2 , Año 2024 : Julio-Diciembrespa
dc.relation.citationendpage1142
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationvolume15spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicosspa
dc.relation.references• Agricultura de las Américas. (2020). El enorme aporte de la ganadería a la economía de Colombia. Agricultura de las Américas. https://agriculturadelasamericas.com/pecuaria/productores-ganaderos-yseguridadalimentaria-mundial/spa
dc.relation.references• Alonso, M.E., González-Montaña, J.R., Lomillos, J. M. (2020). Consumers’ concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animals, 10(3), 385.spa
dc.relation.references• Barnett, J., Hemsworth, P., Hand, A. (1983). Effects of chronic stress on some blood parameters in the pig. Appl. Anim. Ethol, 9, 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0304-3762(83)90007-X.spa
dc.relation.references• Boivin, X., Lensink, J., Tallet, C., Veissier, I. (2003). Stockmanship and farm animal welfare. Animal welfare, 12(4), 479-492.spa
dc.relation.references• Boivin, X. (2018). Animal experience of domestication. In Animal welfare in a changing world (pp. 154-161). Wallingford UK: CAB International.spa
dc.relation.references• Bolt, S. & George, A. (2019). The use of environmental enrichment on farms benefits animal welfare and productivity. Livestock, 24. 183-188. 10.12968/live.2019.24.4.183.spa
dc.relation.references• Broom, D.M. & Fraser, A.F. (2007) Welfare Assessment in Direct Measures of Good Welfare. In Domestic animal behaviour and welfare, 4th edition, Broom, D.M. and A.F. Fraser (Eds.), p.65, Cambridge University Press, London.spa
dc.relation.references• Cafe, L.M., Robinson, D.L., Ferguson, D.M., McIntyre, B.L., Geesink, G.H., Greenwood, P.L. (2011). Cattle temperament: Persistence of assessments and associations with productivity, efficiency, carcass and meat quality traits. Journal of animal science, 89(5), 1452-1465.spa
dc.relation.references• Claxton, A.M. (2011). The potential of the human-animal relationship as an environmental enrichment for the welfare of zoo-housed animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 133(1–2):1–10.spa
dc.relation.references• Coria-Avila, G.A., Pfaus, J.G., Orihuela, A., Domínguez-Oliva, A., José-Pérez, N., Hernández, L.A., Mota-Rojas, D. (2022). The Neurobiology of Behavior and Its Applicability for Animal Welfare: A Review. Animals 12, 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070928.spa
dc.relation.references• Crast, J., Bloomsmith M.A., Jonesteller, T.J. (2016). Effects of enhanced enrichment in sooty mangabeys. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 55(6).spa
dc.relation.references• Curley, Jr O. (2004). Influence of temperament on bovine hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function. Master of Science. Texas A&M University, de Oliveira Roça, R. Modificações post-mortem (F.C.A. - UNESP - Campus de Botucatu).spa
dc.relation.references• da Silva, P.M., Ferreira, I.C., da Fonseca Neto, Á.M., Malaquias, J.V., de Pinho, A.S., de Oliveira, A.S., Martins, C.F. (2021). Does environmental enrichment consisting of brushing prepartum zebu heifers improve first-lactation behavior? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 234, 105206.spa
dc.relation.references• Demba, S. & Rose, S. (2023) Changes in amount and length of periods of stereotypic behavior in Jersey cows with and without access to pasture. Front. Anim. Sci. 4:1148523. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2023.1148523spa
dc.relation.references• Destrez, A., Haslin, E., Boivin, X. (2018). What stockperson behavior during weighing reveals about the relationship between humans and suckling beef cattle: A preliminary study. Applied animal behaviour science, 209, 8-13.spa
dc.relation.references• Dickson, E.J., Campbell, D.L., Lee, C., Lea, J.M., McDonald, P.G., Monk, J.E. (2022). Beef Cattle Preference and Usage of Environmental Enrichments Provided Simultaneously in a Pasture-Based Environment. Animals, 12(24), 3544.spa
dc.relation.references• Dickson, E.J., Monk, J.E., Lee, C., Campbell, D.L. (2024). Environmental enrichment during yard weaning alters the performance of calves in an attention bias and a novel object recognition test. Frontiers in Animal Science, 5, 1364259.spa
dc.relation.references• Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC). (1992). The Five freedoms. Veterinary Record 131, 357.spa
dc.relation.references• Federación Colombiana de Ganaderos -Fedegán. (2020). El enorme aporte de la ganadería a la economía de Colombia. Agricultura de las Américas.spa
dc.relation.references• Ferguson, D.M. & Warner, R.D. (2008). Have we underestimated the impact of preslaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat science, 80(1), 12-19.spa
dc.relation.references• Fraser, D., Fraser, A. F., Ritchie, J.S.D. (1975). The term “stress” in a veterinary context. British Veterinary Journal, 131(6), 653-662.spa
dc.relation.references• Fordyce, G. & Goddard, M.E. (1984). Maternal influence on the temperament of Bos indicus cross cows. In Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production (Vol. 15, pp. 345-348).spa
dc.relation.references• Fordyce, G., Goddard, M.E., Tyler, R., Williams, G., Toleman, M.A. (1985). Temperament and bruising of Bos indicus cross cattle. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 25(2), 283-288.spa
dc.relation.references• Fraser, D. & Duncan, I.J. (1998). ‘Pleasures’,'pains’ and animal welfare: toward a natural history of affect. Animal welfare, 7(4), 383-396.spa
dc.relation.references• Georg, H. & Totschek, K. (2001). Investigation of an automatic brush for dairy cows. Landtechnik, 56, 260-261.spa
dc.relation.references• Godyn, D, Nowicki, J, Herbut, P. (2019). Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Pig Welfare. Animals:1–17.spa
dc.relation.references• Grunert, K.G., Sonntag, W.I., Glanz-Chanos, V., Forum, S. (2018). Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment. Meat science, 137, 123-129.spa
dc.relation.references• Guy, J. H.; Meads, Z. A.; Shiel, R. S. and Edwards, S. A. (2013). The effect of combining different environmental enrichmentmaterials on enrichment use by growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 144:102-10. 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.01.006.spa
dc.relation.references• Hemsworth, P.H., & Coleman, G.J. (2010). Human-livestock interactions: The stockperson and the productivity of intensively farmed animals. CABI.spa
dc.relation.references• Hemsworth, P.H., Sherwen, S.L., Coleman, G.J. (2018). Human contact. Animal welfare, (Ed. 3), 294-314.spa
dc.relation.references• Herron, M.E, Buffington, C.A.T. (2010). Environmental enrichment for indoor cats. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 32(12).spa
dc.relation.references• Horvath, K.C., Allen, A.N., Miller-Cushon E.K. (2020). Effects of access to stationary brushes and chopped hay on behavior and performance of individually housed dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 103(9):8421-8432. PMID: 32564951. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-18042.spa
dc.relation.references• Horvath, K.C., Miller-Cushon, E.K. (2019). Characterizing grooming behavior patterns and the influence of brush access on the behavior of group-housed dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 102(4):3421-3430. PMID: 30738669. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15460.spa
dc.relation.references• Huber, R., Baumung, R., Wurzinger, M., Semambo, D., Okeyo, A., Winckler, C. (2008). Grazing, social and comfort behaviour of Ankole and crossbred (Ankole × Holstein) heifers on pasture in south western Uganda. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 112. 223-234. 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.08.006.spa
dc.relation.references• Hultgren, J., Arvidsson Segerkvist, K., Berg, C., Karlsson, A.H., Algers, B. (2020). Animal handling and stress-related behaviour at mobile slaughter of cattle. Prev Vet Med, 177:104959. PMID: 32240886. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104959.spa
dc.relation.references• Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario-ICA. (2020). Resolución No 067449 (08/05/2020). Requisitos para obtener la certificación en Buenas Prácticas Ganaderas-BPG en la producción de leche https:/ www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/Areas/Pecuaria/S ervicios/Inocuidad-en-las-CadenasAgroalimentarias/LISTADO-DE-PREDIOS-CERTIFICADOSEN-BPG/Resolucion-067449-del-08-de-mayo-2020- 1.pdf.aspx?lang=es-COspa
dc.relation.references• Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario-ICA. (2020). Resolución N°068167 (20/05/2020). Requisitos para obtener la certificación en Buenas Prácticas Ganaderas-BPG en la producción de carne de bovinos y/o bufalinos. https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/db5b53ff-0752-4884- 90b8- a7ce15ce1ead/2020R68167.aspx#:~:text=BUENAS%20PRÁCTICAS %20GANADERAS%20(BPG)%3A,la%20protección%20del%20medio%20ambiente.spa
dc.relation.references• Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario-ICA. (2015). Resolución Nº 003714 (20/10/2015). Por la cual se establecen las enfermedades de declaración obligatoria en Colombia. https://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/3188abb6-2297-44e2-89e6- 3a5dbd4db210/2015R3714.aspx#:~:text=4%20(20%20OCT.,de%20declaración%20oblig atoria%20en%20Colombia".&text=2015)%20003714- ,"Por%20la%20cual%20se%20establecen%20las,de%20declaración%20obligatoria%20e n%20Colombia".spa
dc.relation.references• Ishiwata, T., Uetake, K., Abe, N., Eguchi, Y., Tanaka, T. (2006). Effects of an environmental enrichment using a drum can on behavioral, physiological and productive characteristics in fattening beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 77, 352–362. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1740-0929.2006.00359.xspa
dc.relation.references• Johnson, R.A., Johnson, P.J., Megarani, D.V., Patel S.D., Yaglom H.D., Osterlind, S., Grindler, K., Vogelweid, C.M., Parker, T.M., Pascua, C.K. (2017). Horses Working in Therapeutic Riding Programs: Cortisol, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Glucose, and Behavior Stress Indicators. J Equine Vet Sci. 57:77–85.spa
dc.relation.references• Kendrick, K.M., da Costa, A.P., Leigh, A.E., Hinton, M.R., Peirce, J.W. (2001). Sheep don't forget a face. Nature, 414(6860), 165-166.spa
dc.relation.references• León-Llanos, L. M. & Flórez-Díaz, H. (2016). La importancia del temperamento en la producción de ganado de carne bovina. Orinoquia, 20(2), 55-63.spa
dc.relation.references• Leruste, H., Bokkers, E.A.M., Heutinck, L.F.M., Wolthuis-Fillerup, M., Van Der Werf, J.T.N., Brscic, M., Lensink, B.J. (2012). Evaluation of on-farm veal calves’ responses to unfamiliar humans and potential influencing factors. Animal, 6(12), 2003-2010.spa
dc.relation.references• Maciel, A.B. (2006). Proposta de avaliação da condição corporal em vacas Holandesa e Nelore. Botucatu. Dissertação (Mestrado). UNESP Botucatu. Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Programa de Pos-graduação em Zootecnia.spa
dc.relation.references• MADR, M. Resolución 126. (2022). Lineamientos de Política de Ganadería Bovina Sostenible 2022-2050, Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (MADR), Ministerio de Ambiento y Desarrollo Sostenible (MADS), Bogotá, DC, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.references• Mandel, R., Whay, H.R., Klement, E., Nicol, C.J. (2016). Invited review: Environmental enrichment of dairy cows and calves in indoor housing. Journal of dairy science, 99(3), 1695-1715.spa
dc.relation.references• McConnachie, E., Smid, A.M.C., Thompson, A.J., Weary, D.M., Gaworski, M.A., Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2018). Cows are highly motivated to access a grooming substrate. Biol. Lett.1420180303. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0303.spa
dc.relation.references• Moreno, P.S., Salamanca, P.N., Pérez, Z.D., Arango, S.J., Cobos, S.O. (2021). Cartilla ilustrativa: elementos bióticos (Mycota, Plantae, Animalia) del área natural “reserva” del Centro Agroindustrial del Meta, CAM sede Hachón. https://repositorio.sena.edu.co/handle/11404/7193spa
dc.relation.references• Morgan, K.N., & Tromborg, C.T. (2007). Sources of stress in captivity. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 102, 262–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032.spa
dc.relation.references• Müller, R., & von Keyserlingk, M.A. (2006). Consistency of flight speed and its correlation to productivity and to personality in Bos taurus beef cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 99(3-4), 193-204.spa
dc.relation.references• Munilla, M.E., Lado, M., Vittone, J.S., Romera, S.A. (2019). Bienestar animal durante el período de engorde de bovinos. Revista veterinaria, 30(2), 82-89.spa
dc.relation.references• Ninomiya, S. & Sato, S. (2009). Effects of ‘Five freedoms’ environmental enrichment on the welfare of calves reared indoors. Animal science journal, 80(3), 347-351.spa
dc.relation.references• Owen, M.A., Swaisgood, R.R., Czekala, N.M., Donald, G., Lindburg, D.G. (2005). Enclosure choice and well-being in giant pandas: is it all about control? Zoo Biol. 24:475–81. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20064.spa
dc.relation.references• Paranhos da Costa, M.J.R., San’Anna, A.C., Silva, L.C.M. (2015). Temperamento de bovinos Gir e Girolando: efeitos geneticos e de manejo. Informe Agropecuario 36 (286), 100–107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289533842_Tempe ramento_de_bovinos_Gir_e_Girolando_efeitos_geneticos_e_de_manejo.spa
dc.relation.references• Park, R.M., Schubach, K.M., Cooke, R.F., Herring, A.D., Jennings, J.S., Daigle, C.L. (2020). Impact of a cattle brush on feedlot steer behavior, productivity and stress physiology. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 228, 104995.spa
dc.relation.references• Pempek, J., Eastridge, M., Proudfoot, K. (2017). The effect of a furnished individual hutch pre-weaning on calf behavior, response to novelty, and growth. Journal of Dairy Science, 100. 10.3168/jds.2016-12180.spa
dc.relation.references• Pinillos, R.G., Appleby, M.C., Manteca, X., Scott‐Park, F., Smith, C., Velarde, A. (2016). One Welfare–a platform for improving human and animal welfare. Veterinary Record, 179(16), 412-413.spa
dc.relation.references• Rault, J.L., Sandøe, P., Sonntag, Q., Stuardo, L. (2022). Positive animal welfare: bridging the gap or raising inequalities worldwide? Frontiers in Animal Science, 3, 825379.spa
dc.relation.references• Rault, J.L., Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X., Hemsworth, P. (2020). The power of a positive human–animal relationship for animal welfare. Frontiers in veterinary science, 7, 590867.spa
dc.relation.references• Reyes, F.S., Gimenez, A.R., Anderson, K.M., Miller-Cushon, E.K., Dorea, J.R., Van Os, J.M.C. (2022). Impact of Stationary Brush Quantity on Brush Use in Group-Housed Dairy Heifers. Animals 12, 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12080972.spa
dc.relation.references• Ross, S.R. (2006). Issues of choice and control in the behaviour of a pair of captive polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Behav Proc. 73:117–20. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.04.003.spa
dc.relation.references• Schütz, A., Busch, G., Sonntag, W.I. (2020). Environmental enrichment in pig husbandry–Citizens’ ratings of pictures showing housing elements using an online-survey. Livestock Science, 240, 104218.spa
dc.relation.references• Sinclair, M., Lee, N.Y., Hötzel, M.J., de Luna, M.C., Sharma, A., Idris, M., Derkley, T., Li, C., Islam, M.A., Iyasere, O.S., Navarro, G., Ahmed, A.A., Khruapradab, C., Curry, M., Burns, G.L., Marchant, J.N. (2022). International perceptions of animals and the importance of their welfare. Front Anim Sci, 3:960379. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2022.960379.spa
dc.relation.references• Strappini, A.C., Monti, G., Sepúlveda-Varas, P., de Freslon, I., Peralta, J. M. (2021). Measuring Calves' Usage of Multiple Environmental Enrichment Objects Provided Simultaneously. Front Vet Sci, 8:698681. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.698681.spa
dc.relation.references• Taylor, P.S., Schrobback, P., Verdon, M., Lee, C. (2023). An effective environmental enrichment framework for the continual improvement of production animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 32:e14. doi:10.1017/awf.2023.5.spa
dc.relation.references• Van de Weerd, H.A. & Day, J.E. (2009). A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116(1), 1-20.spa
dc.relation.references• Van Reenen, C.G., Van der Werf, J.T., Bruckmaier, R.M., Hopster, H., Engel, B., Noordhuizen, J.P., Blokhuis, H.J. (2002). Individual differences in behavioral and physiological responsiveness of primiparous dairy cows to machine milking. J Dairy Sci, 85, 2551–2561. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74338-5.spa
dc.relation.references• Van Os, J.M., Goldstein, S.A., Weary, D.M., von Keyserlingk, M.A. (2021). Stationary brush use in naive dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci, 104(11):12019-12029. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20467. Epub 2021 Aug 5. PMID: 34364642.spa
dc.relation.references• Vargas, Á.G., & Jaramillo H.D. (2013). Identificación y efectos de los diferentes métodos del amamantamiento restringido sobre la funcionalidad ovárica posparto en hembras bovinas mestizas doble propósito. Revista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicos, 4(1), 78-107. https://doi.org/10.22579/22484817.612.spa
dc.relation.references• Vigors, B., Ewing, D.A., Lawrence A.B. (2021). The Importance of Farm Animal Health and Natural Behaviors to Livestock Farmers: Findings From a Factorial Survey Using Vignettes. Front Anim Sci, 2:638782. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2021.638782.spa
dc.relation.references• Villalba, J.J & Manteca, X. (2019). A Case for Eustress in Grazing Animals. Front Vet Sci, 6:303. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00303.spa
dc.relation.references• Voisinet, B.D., Grandin, T., Tatum, J.D., O'Connor, S.F., Struthers, J.J. (1997). Feedlot cattle with calm temperaments have higher average daily gains than cattle with excitable temperaments. J Anim Sci, 75(4):892-6. doi: 10.2527/1997.754892x. PMID: 9110198.spa
dc.relation.references• Welfare Quality. (2009). Assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Leystad, Netherlands.spa
dc.relation.references• Wilson, S.C., Mitlöhner, F.M., Morrow-Tesch, J., Dailey, J.W., McGlone, J.J. (2002). An assessment of several potential enrichment devices for feedlot cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 76(4), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00019-9spa
dc.relation.references• Zhang, C., Juniper, D., Meagher, R.K. (2021). Effects of physical enrichment items and social housing on calves’ growth, behaviour and response to novelty. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 237. 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105295.spa
dc.relation.references• Zobel, G., Neave, H.W., Henderson, H.V., Webster, J. (2017). Calves Use an Automated Brush and a Hanging Rope When Pair-Housed. Animals, 7, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7110084spa
dc.rightsRevista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicos - 2024spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/sistemasagroecologicos/article/view/1142spa
dc.subjectbehavioreng
dc.subjectcattleeng
dc.subjectenrichmenteng
dc.subjectextensive productioneng
dc.subjectwellbeingeng
dc.subjectbienestarspa
dc.subjectcomportamientospa
dc.subjectenriquecimientospa
dc.subjectganado vacunospa
dc.subjectproducción extensivaspa
dc.subjectbem-estarspa
dc.subjectcomportamentospa
dc.subjectgado bovinospa
dc.subjectenriquecimentospa
dc.subjectprodução extensaspa
dc.titleEfecto del enriquecimiento ambiental sobre la ganancia de peso y la relación humano-animal en bovinos en pastoreospa
dc.title.translatedEffect of environmental enrichment on weight gain and human-animal relationship in grazing cattleeng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublicationspa

Archivos

Colecciones

Revista Sistemas de Producción Agroecológicos