Icono govco
 

Publicación:
Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI)

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorRodríguez Castro, Karen Giselle
dc.contributor.advisorRamírez Malaver, Jorge Luis
dc.contributor.authorUbaque Bernal, Jhoimar de Jesús
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-13T13:28:57Z
dc.date.available2023-04-13T13:28:57Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionIncluye figuras, tablas y anexosspa
dc.description.abstractEl género Potamotrygon incluye 33 especies de rayas de rio, pero la identificación de sus especies ha presentado dificultades debido a la escasez de caracteres puntuales para identificar especies, su sistemática compleja con varios ejemplos de especies cripticas en todo su rango de distribución. Por tal razón la delimitación de especies utilizando características alternativas, como las moleculares, es importante en estos casos. El objetivo de este estudio fue delimitar las especies del género utilizando datos moleculares, comparar los resultados con las especies definidas con datos morfológicos y definir MOTUs (ingles Molecular operational Taxonomic Units) y relacionar su existencia con eventos evolutivos. Con el uso de 255 secuencias del gen citocromo oxidasa I (COI) obtenidas a partir de datos depositados en NCBI y BOLD de distintos autores y de diferentes localidades, realizamos la delimitación de especies de Potamotrygon con los métodos PTP, bPTP y GYMC. Para finalizar, se compararon las MOTUs encontradas con las regiones biogeográficas. Encontramos 84 haplotipos donde especies diferentes compartían un mismo haplotipo. Además, en el árbol ultramétrico se delimitaron por el análisis de GYMC 27 MOTUs, PTP 28MOTUs y bPTP 29 MOTUs. El consenso delimitó 28 MOTUs, que guardan relación con la región biogeográfica y en menor medida, con especies nominales. Ciertos MOTUs encontradas corresponden a las especies nominales de las secuencias trabajadas, sin embargo, algunas presentan inconsistencias. Sugerimos qué esto se debe a especies cripticas, una alta variabilidad morfológica y la existencia de complejos de especies. El número de regiones biogeográficas influencian en el número de MOTUs y algunas MOTUs son de amplia distribución mientras que algunas son propias de una única cuenca. Otro aspecto importante es que la historia evolutiva (biogeográfica) de las cuencas han influido en la alta diversidad de especies del género. Por último, la delimitación de especies utilizando métodos coalescentes con estas secuencias fue eficiente para el género Potamotrygon, los MOTUs obtenidos se ajustan adecuadamente a las regiones biogeográficas y la alta variabilidad de especies es explicada por los eventos evolutivos ocurridos en sus diferentes cuencas.spa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.description.degreenameBiólogospa
dc.description.programBiologíaspa
dc.description.tableofcontents1.Resumen. – 2. Planteamiento Del Problema. – 3. Objetivos. – 4. Objetivo general. -- 5. Objetivos específicos. – 6. Justificación. – 7. Marco Teórico. – 8. Identificación molecular: códigos de barras de ADN y aplicaciones. – 9. Bases de datos genéticas. – 10. Delimitación de especies. – 11. Estudios en peces; género Potamotrygon. Metodología. – 12. Obtención y análisis de secuencias. – 13. Delimitación de especies. – 14. Clasificación biogeográfica. – 15. Resultados. Discusión De Resultados. – 16. Conclusiones. – 17. Bibliografía. – 18. Anexos.spa
dc.format.extent44 Páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationUbaque Bernal, Jhoimar de J. (2022). Delimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI) [Trabajo de grado, Universidad de los Llanos]. Repositorio digital Universidad de los Llanos.spa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad de los Llanosspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio digital Universidad de los Llanosspa
dc.identifier.repourlhttps://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/2849
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de los Llanosspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Básicas e Ingenieríaspa
dc.publisher.placeVillavicenciospa
dc.relation.indexedN/Aspa
dc.relation.referencesAdnet S, Gismondi R, Antoine P. 2014. Comparisons of Dental Morphology in River Stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae) with New Fossils from the Middle Eocene of Peruvian Amazonia Rekindle Debate on Their Evolution.Naturwissenschaften 101 (1): 33–45.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlbert J, Lovejoy N, Crampton W. 2006. Miocene tectonism and the separation of cis - and trans - Andean rivers basin: evidence from Neotropical fishes. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 21: 1-14.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlbert J, Reis, R. 2011. Historical Biogeography of Neotropical Freshwater Fishes. University of California Press, Los Angeles, California.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlfonsin M, Bucetto M. 2019. Las especies en peligro de extinción y los mecanismos para la recuperación y conservación de la biodiversidad: un estudio sobre la viabilidad de los mecanismos y las trabas burocráticas. Revista LEX: Universidad Alas Peruanas, 9: 23, 297-324spa
dc.relation.referencesAltschul S.F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E.W. Lipman, D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol, 215: 403–410.spa
dc.relation.referencesAngermeier P, Winston M. 1998. Local vs. Regional influences on local diversity in stream fish communities of Virginia. Ecology, 79 (3): 911-927.spa
dc.relation.referencesAraujo M, Charvet-Almeida M, Pereira H. 2004.Freshwater Stingrays (Potamotrygonidae): Status, Conservation and Management Challenges. Information document AC20: 8, 1-6spa
dc.relation.referencesBanerjee D, Kumar V, Singha D, Chandra K, Laskar B, Kundu S, Chakraborty R, Chatterjee S. 2015. Identification through DNA barcoding of Tabanidae (Diptera) vectors of surra disease in India. Acta Trop, 150: 52–58spa
dc.relation.referencesBatista-Morales A, Lasso C, Morales-Betancourt M, Caballero S. 2017. Phylogeography and genetic structure of the species complex of the freshwater stingray, Potamotrygon orbignyi (Castelnau, 1855), among Amazonas and Orinoco rivers. Repositorio Uniandes, 1-56spa
dc.relation.referencesBeheregaray L, Caccone A. 2007. Cryptic biodiversity in a changing world. Journal of Biology, 6:9spa
dc.relation.referencesBermingham, E. Moritz C. 1998. Comparative phylogeography: Concepts and applications. Molecular Ecology, 7: 367-369.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlaxter M, Mann J, Chapman T, Thomas F, Whitton C, Floyd R Abebe E. 2005. Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci 360: 1935–1943.spa
dc.relation.referencesBouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu C.H, Xie D, Suchard M, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2014. BEAST 2: A software platform for bayesianevolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol, 10(4): e1003537.spa
dc.relation.referencesCaldas J, Castro-González V, Puentes M, Lasso C, Duarte L, Grijalba-Bendeck M, Gómez F, Navia A, Mejía-Falla P, Bessudo S, Diazgranados M, Zapata-Padilla L (Eds.). 2010. Plan de Acción Nacional para la Conservación y Manejo de Tiburones, Rayas y Quimeras de Colombia (PAN-Tiburones Colombia). Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario, Secretaria Agricultura y Pesca San Andrés Isla, Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, Instituto Alexander Von Humboldt, Universidad del Magdalena, Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Pontifcia Universidad Javeriana, Fundación SQUALUS, Fundación Malpelo y otros EcosistemasMarinos, Conservación Internacional, WWF Colombia. Editorial Produmedios, Bogotá. 60 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesCañedo A, Rodríguez-Labrada R, Vázquez-Mojena Y. 2009. Centro Nacional para la Información Biotecnológica de los Estados Unidos: un palacio de la información para la medicina molecular. Revista cubana de los profesionales de la información y la comunicación en salud, 19(4): 19spa
dc.relation.referencesCarstens B.C, Pelletier T.A, Reid N.M, Satler J.D. 2013. How to fail at species delimitation. Mol Ecol. 22:4369–4383spa
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho M, Lovejoy N, Rosa R. 2003. Family Potamotrygonidae. 22-29. En: Reis, Feraris R, & Kullander S. Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America. Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 729p.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho M, Sabaj-Pérez M, Lovejoy R. 2011. Potamotrygon tigrina, a new species of freshwater stingray from the Upper Amazon basin, closely related to Potamotrygon schroederi Fernández-Yépez 1958 (Chondricthyes: Potamotrygonidae). Zootaxa, 2827:1-30spa
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho M, Paulo J, Silva C, Loboda T, Silva P, Ragno M, Soares M. 2013. Systematics and Evolution of the Highly Diverse and Morphologically Complex Neotropical Freshwater Stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae). Modalidad, Conferencia: 9th Indo-Pacific Fish Conference, en Okinawa, Japanspa
dc.relation.referencesCBD: Convention on Biological Diversity.2011. [citado 12 de Octubre de 2021]; Disponible en: http://www.cbd.int/spa
dc.relation.referencesCharvet-Almeida P, Araújo M, Almeida M. 2005 Reproductive aspects of freshwater stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae) in the Brazilian Amazon Basin. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery. Science, 35: 165–171spa
dc.relation.referencesCruz V, Vera M, Mendonça F, Pardo B, Martinez P, Oliveira C, Foresti F. 2015. First identification of interspecies hybridization in the freshwater stingrays Potamotrygon motoro and P. falkneri (Myliobatiformes, Potamotrygonidae). Conserv Genet, 16: 241–245spa
dc.relation.referencesCruz V, Nobile M, Paim F, Adachi A, Ribeiro G, Ferreira D, Pansonato-Alves J, Charvet P, Oliveira C, Foresti F. 2021. Cytogenetic and molecular characteristics of Potamotrygon motoro and Potamotrygon sp. (Chondrichthyes, Myliobatiformes, Potamotrygonidae) from the Amazon basin: Implications for the taxonomy of the genus. Genetics and molecular biology, 44(2): e20200083.spa
dc.relation.referencesDarriba D, Taboada L, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods, 9(8): 772.spa
dc.relation.referencesDellicour S, Flot J. 2018. The hitchhiker’s guide to single-locus species delimitation. Molecular Ecology Resources, 18(6):1234–1246spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz J, Villanova V, Brancolini F, del Pazo F, Posner V, Grimberg A, Arranz A. 2016. First DNA Barcode Reference Library for the Identification of South American Freshwater Fish from the Lower Paraná River. PLoS ONE, 11(7): e0157419.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrummond A.J, Bouckaert R. 2015. Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis with BEAST. Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesFaria V, Rolim L, Vaz L, Furtado-Neto M. 2012. Reevaluation of RAPD Markers Involved in a Case of Stingray Misidentification (Dasyatidae: Dasyatis). Genetics and Molecular Research, 11(4): 3835–45.spa
dc.relation.referencesFontenelle J, Marques F, Kolmann M, Lovejoy N. 2021a. Biogeography of the neotropical freshwater stingrays (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygoninae) reveals effects of continent- scale paleogeographic change and drainage evolution. J Biogeogr, 0(0): 1–14spa
dc.relation.referencesFontenelle J, Marques F, Kolmann M, Lovejoy N. 2021b. Biogeography of the neotropicalfreshwater stingrays (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygoninae) reveals effects of continent-scale paleogeographic change and drainage evolution. J Biogeogr, 0(0):1–14.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlot J.F. 2015. Species delimitation’s coming of age. Syst Biol, 64(6):897–899.spa
dc.relation.referencesFloyd R, Abebe E, Papert A, Blaxter M. 2002. Molecular Barcodes for Soil Nematode Identification. Mol Ecol, 11(4):839-850spa
dc.relation.referencesFunk D, Omland E. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 34: 397–423spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía D, Lasso C, Morales M, Caballero S. 2015: Molecular systematics of the freshwater stingrays (myliobatiformes: potamotrygonidae) of the Amazon, Orinoco, Magdalena, Esequibo, Caribbean, and Maracaibo basins (Colombia – Venezuela): evidence from three mitochondrial genes. Mitochondrial DNA, 1-13spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Melo J, Oliveira C, Da Costa S, Ochoa-Orrego L, Garcia L, Maldonado Ocampo J .2019. Species delimitation of neotropical Characins (Stevardiinae): Implications for taxonomy of complex groups. PLoS ONE, 14(6): e0216786.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Villamil, D. 2012. Molecular systematics of the freshwater stingrays (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygonidae) of the Amazon, Orinoco, Magdalena, Essequibo, Caribe and Maracaibo basins (Colombia- Venezuela): evidence from mitochondrial genes. Tesis de Maestría, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia, Bogotá. 32 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonçalves P, Oliveira-Marques A, Matsumoto T, Miyaki C. 2015. DNA barcoding identifies illegal parrot trade. J Hered, 106: 560–564.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraça W, Pavanelli C, Buckup P. 2008. Two new species of Characidium (Characiformes: Crenuchidae) from Paraguay and Xingu River basins, State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Copeia, 2008:326–332spa
dc.relation.referencesHartvig I, Czako M, Kjær ED, Nielsen LR, Theilade I .2015. The Use of DNA Barcoding in Identification and Conservation of Rosewood (Dalbergia spp.). PLoS ONE, 10(9)spa
dc.relation.referencesHebert P, Cywinska A, Ball S, de Waard J. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society Lond, 270: 313-321.spa
dc.relation.referencesHebert P, Penton E, Burns J, Janzen D, Hallwachs W. 2004a. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the Neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerater. PNAS. 101(41): 12-17spa
dc.relation.referencesHebert P, Stoeckle M, Zemlak T, Francis M. 2004b. Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes. PLoS Biol, 2(10):312spa
dc.relation.referencesHebert P, Ryan Gregory T.2005. The Promise of DNA Barcoding for Taxonom. Systematic Biology, 54(5): 852–859spa
dc.relation.referencesHey J, Waples R, Arnold M, Butlin R, Harrison R. 2003. Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol, 18(11):597–603.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoffmann M, Hilton-Taylor C, Angulo A, Böhm M, Brooks. 2010. The Impact of Conservation on the Status of the World s Vertebrates. Science, 2; 330(6010), 1503- 1509.spa
dc.relation.referencesHopkins G, Freckleton, R. 2002. Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. Animal Conservation, 5: 245-249.spa
dc.relation.referencesHubert N, Renno J. 2006. Historical biogeography of South American freshwater fishes. Journal of Biogeography, 33: 1414-1436.spa
dc.relation.referencesJalali K, Ojha R,Venkatesan T. 2015. DNA Barcoding for Identification of Agriculturally Important Insects. En: Chakravarthy K. New Horizons in Insect Science: Towards Sustainable Pest Management, Springer India. Bangalore India, 13-23spa
dc.relation.referencesJones M, Ghoorah A, Blaxter M. 2011. JMOTU and taxonerator: turning DNA barcode sequences into annotated operational taxonomic units. PLOS ONE, 6:e19259spa
dc.relation.referencesKaur S. 2015. DNA Barcoding and Its Applications. IJERGS, 3 (2): 3.spa
dc.relation.referencesKearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28(12):1647-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesKekkonen M, Mutanen M, Kaila L, Nieminen M, Hebert PDN. 2015. Delineating Species with DNA Barcodes: A Case of Taxon Dependent Method Performance in Moths. PLoS One, 10: e0122481.spa
dc.relation.referencesKolokotronis S, Leslie M. 2010. Barcoding bushmeat: Molecular identification of Central African and South American harvested vertebrates. Conservation Genetics, 11(4): 1389-1404spa
dc.relation.referencesKullander S. 1986. Cichlid Fishes of the Amazon River Drainage of Peru. Swedish Stockholm: Museum of Natural History.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuntke F, Jonge N, Hesselsøe M, & Nielsen J. 2020. Stream water quality assessment by metabarcoding of invertebrates. Ecological Indicators, 111: 105982.spa
dc.relation.referencesLasso, C. 1985. Las rayas de agua dulce. Natura 77: 6–9spa
dc.relation.referencesLasso C, Rosa R, Sanchez-Duarte P, Morales-Betancourt M, Agudelo-Cordoba E. 2013. IX. Rayas de Agua Dulce (Potamotrygonidae) de Suramérica. Parte I.spa
dc.relation.referencesColombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Perú, Brasil, Guyana, Surinam Y Guayana Francesa: Diversidad, Bioecolog+ia, Uso Y Conservación. Serie Editorial Recursos Hidrobiológicos Y Pesqueros Continentales de Colombia. Serie Edit. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Instituto de Investigación de los Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH).spa
dc.relation.referencesLatrubesse E, Stevaux J, Santos M, Assine M. 2005. Grandes sistemas fluviais: geologia, geomorfologia e paleoidrologia. En Quaternário do Brasil, edited by. Souza C, Suguio K, Oliveira A, Oliveira P. 276–297. Ribeirão Preto: Holos Editora.spa
dc.relation.referencesLibrado P, Rozas J. 2009. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics, 25(11):1451-2.spa
dc.relation.referencesLobola T, Carvalho M. 2013. Systematic revisión of the Potamotrygon motoro (Mûller & Henle, 1841) species complex in the Paraná-Paraguay basin, with description of two new ocellated species (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygonidae). Neotropical Ichthyology 11(4): 693-737.spa
dc.relation.referencesLohse, K. 2009. Can mtDNA barcodes be used to delimit species? A response to Pons et al (2006). Systematic Biology, 58(4): 439–442.spa
dc.relation.referencesLovejoy N, Birminghan E, Martin A. 1998. South American rays came in with the sea. Nature, 396:421-422.spa
dc.relation.referencesLundberg J, Marshall L, Guerrero J, Horton B, Malabarba M, Wesselingh F. 1998. The stage for Neotropical fish diversification: A history of tropical South American rivers pp. 13-48. En: Malabarba M, Reis R, Vari R, Lucena Z, Lucena C (Eds. Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Porto Alegre, Brazil, EDIPUCRS. pp 603spa
dc.relation.referencesMagoga G, Coral S, Fontaneto D, Montagna M. 2018. Barcoding of Chrysomelidae of Euro-Mediterranean area: efficiency and problematic species. Scientific Reports, 8: 13398.spa
dc.relation.referencesMason N, Fletcher N, Gill, B, Funk W, Zamudio K. 2020. Coalescent-based species delimitation is sensitive to geographic sampling and isolation by distance. Systematics and Biodiversity, 18(3): 269–280.spa
dc.relation.referencesMayr E.1942. Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesMeyer C, Paulay G. 2005. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology, 3(12): e422.spa
dc.relation.referencesMontoya-Burgos J. 2003. Historical biogeography of the catfish genus Hypostomus (Siluriformes: Loricariidae), with implications on the diversification of Neotropical ichthyofauna. Molecular Ecology, 12: 1855-1867.spa
dc.relation.referencesNanney, D. 1982. Genes and phenes in Tetrahymena. Bioscience, 32: 783–78spa
dc.relation.referencesNielsen R, Wakeley J. 2001. Distinguishing migration from Isolation: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach. Genet, 158(2): 885–896.spa
dc.relation.referencesNosil P, Funk D, Ortiz-Barriento D. 2009. Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Molecular ecology, 18(3): 375-402spa
dc.relation.referencesOlivieri G, Zimmermann E, Randrianambinina B, Rasoloharijaona S, Rakotondravony D, Guschanski K, Radespiel U. 2007.The ever-increasing diversity in mouse lemurs: three new species in north and northwestern Madagascar. Mol Phylogenet Evol, 43(1):309-27.spa
dc.relation.referencesPace, N. 1997. A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science 276: 734–740.spa
dc.relation.referencesPaine M, McDowell J, Graves J. (2007). Specific identification of Western Atlantic Ocean scombrids using mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene region sequences. Bull. Mar. Sci., 80(2): 353-367.spa
dc.relation.referencesPalacio-López K, Rodriguez-López N. 2007. Phenotypic Plasticity in Lippia alba (Verbenaceae) in Response to Water Availability in Two Light Environments. Acta Biológica Colombiana: 12, 187-198.spa
dc.relation.referencesPalsbøll P, Martine B, and Fred W. Allendorf. 2007. Identification of Management Units Using Population Genetic Data. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22 (1): 11– 16spa
dc.relation.referencesPanprommin D, Soontornprasit K, Tuncharoen S, Pithakpol S, Keereelang J. 2019. DNA barcodes for the identification of species diversity in fish from Kwan Phayao, Thailand Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 12(3): 82-389spa
dc.relation.referencesPentinsaari M, Hebert P, Mutanen M. 2014. Barcoding beetles: A regional survey of 1872 species reveals high identification success and unusually deep interspecific divergences. PLoS One, 9(9): e108651spa
dc.relation.referencesPentinsaari M, Vos R, Mutanen M. 2017. Algorithmic single-locus species delimitation: effects of sampling effort, variation and non monophyly in four methods and 1870 species of beetles. Molecular Ecology Resources, 17(3): 393–404.spa
dc.relation.referencesPereira L, Hanner R, Foresti F, Oliveira C. 2013. Can DNA barcoding accurately discriminate megadiverse Neotropical freshwater fish fauna?. BMC Genetics, 14:20.spa
dc.relation.referencesPfenninger M, Schwenk K. 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol Biol, 7: 121spa
dc.relation.referencesPfenninger M, Schwenk K. 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol Biol, 7: 121spa
dc.relation.referencesPfenninger M, Schwenk K. 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol Biol, 7: 121spa
dc.relation.referencesPorter T, Hajibabaei, M. 2018. Over 2.5 million COI sequences in GenBank and growing. PloS one, 13(9),spa
dc.relation.referencesQuattrini A, Wu T, Soong K, Jeng M, Benayahu Y,McFadden C. 2019. A next generation approach to species delimitation reveals the role of hybridization in a cryptic species complex of corals. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 19:116spa
dc.relation.referencesQueiroz K. 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst. Biol, 56(6): 879–886.spa
dc.relation.referencesRambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D. 2014. Tracer v1.6. Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracerspa
dc.relation.referencesRambaut A. 2019. Figtree v1.4.4. Available from http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/spa
dc.relation.referencesRamirez J.L, Santos C.A, Machado C.B, Oliveira A.K, Garavello J.C, Britski H.A, Galetti P.M. 2020. Molecular phylogeny and species delimitation of the genus Schizodon (Characiformes, Anostomidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol, 153:106959.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamirez J.L, Santos C.A, Machado C.B, Oliveira A.K, Garavello J.C, Britski H.A, Galetti P.M. 2020. Molecular phylogeny and species delimitation of the genus Schizodon (Characiformes, Anostomidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol, 153:106959.spa
dc.relation.referencesRenza-Millán M, Villa-Navarro F, Lasso C, Morales-Betancourt M, Caballero S. 2016. Capítulo 15. Potamotrygon motoro (Müller & Henle 1841) (Myliobatiformes, Potamotrygonidae) en las cuencas del Orinoco y Amazonas (Colombia). P 377-388. En: Lasso C, Rosa R, Morales-Betancourt M, Garrone-Neto D, Carvalho M (Eds). 2016. XV. Rayas de agua dulce (Potamotrygonidae) de Suramérica. Parte II: Colombia, Brasil, Perú, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay y Argentina. Serie Editorial Recursos Hidrobiológicos y Pesqueros Continentales de Colombia. Investigación de los Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH). Bogotá, D. C., Colombia. 435 ppspa
dc.relation.referencesRenza-Millán M, Lasso C, Morales-Betancourt M, Villa F, Caballero S. 2019. Mitochondrial DNA diversity and population structure of the ocellate freshwater stingray Potamotrygon motoro (Müller & Henle, 1841) (Myliobatiformes: Potamotrygonidae) in the Colombian Amazon and Orinoco Basins. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 30(3): 466-473spa
dc.relation.referencesRincón, G. 2006. Aspectos Taxonómicos, Alimentação E Reprodução Da Raia de Agua Doce Potamotrygon Orbignyi (Castelnau), (Elasmobranchii: Potamotrygonidae) No Rio Paranã-Tocantins. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodrigues M.S, Morelli K, Jansen AM. 2017. Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene as a DNA barcode for discriminating Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and closely related species. Parasites Vectors, 10: 488spa
dc.relation.referencesRocha A, Garber N, Garber A, Stuck K. 2005. Structure of the mitochondrial control region and flanking tRNA genes of Mugil cephalus. Hidrobiológica, 15(2): 139-149spa
dc.relation.referencesRocha A, Garber N, Garber A, Stuck K. 2005. Structure of the mitochondrial control region and flanking tRNA genes of Mugil cephalus. Hidrobiológica, 15(2): 139-149spa
dc.relation.referencesRosa R. 1985. A systematic revision of the South American freshwater stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae). Tesis Doctoral, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, 523 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesRosa R, Charvet-Almeida P, Quijada C. 2010. Biology of the South American potamotrygonid stingrays. pp 24186. En: Carrier J, Musick J, Heithaus R. Sharks and their relatives II. Biodiversity, adaptive physiology and conservation. CRC Press. 639 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesRosenblum E, Sarver B, Brown J, Roches S, Hardwick K Tyler D Hether, EastmanJ, Pennell M, HarmonL. 2012. Goldilocks meets SantaRosalia: an ephemeral speciation model explains patterns of diversification across time scales. Evol. Biol, 39:255–61spa
dc.relation.referencesRosser N, Freitas A, Huertas B, Joron, M, Lamas, G, Mérot C, Simpson F, Willmott K, Mallet J, & Dasmahapatra, K.(2019). Cryptic speciation associated with geographic and ecological divergence in two Amazonian Heliconius butterflies. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 186:(1) 233–249spa
dc.relation.referencesSanches D, Martins T, Lutz Í, Veneza I, Silva R.D, Araújo F, Muriel-Cunha J, Sampaio I, Garcia M, Sousa L.M, Evangelista-Gomes, G. 2021. Mitochondrial DNA suggests Hybridization in Freshwater Stingrays Potamotrygon (POTAMOTRYGONIDAE: MYLIOBATIFORMES) from the Xingu river, Amazonia and reveals speciation in Paratrygon aireba. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 93(3): e20191325spa
dc.relation.referencesSchaefer S, Weitzman S, Britski H. 1989. Review of the Neotropical catfish genus Scoloplax (Pisces: Loricarioidea: Scoloplacidae) with comments on reductive characters in phylogenetic analysis. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 141:181–211.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchlick-Steiner B.C, Steiner F.M, Seifert B, Stauffer C, Christian E, Crozier R.H. 2010. Integrative taxonomy: a multisource approach to exploring biodiversity. Annu Rev Entomol, 55: 421-38spa
dc.relation.referencesSchoch C.L, Seifert K.A, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, Chen W, Consortium B. 2012. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc NatlAcad Sci USA, 109(16):6241–6246.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchwentner M, Brian B, Richter S. 2011. An integrative approach to species delineation incorporating different species concepts: a case study of Limnadopsis (Branchiopoda: Spinicaudata), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 104 (3): 575–599,spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva-Santos R, Ramirez J, Galetti P, Freitas P. 2018. Molecular Evidences of a Hidden Complex Scenario in Leporinus cf. friderici. Front. Genet, 9:47spa
dc.relation.referencesSigovini M, Keppel E, Tagliapietra D. 2016. Open Nomenclature in the biodiversity era. Methods in Ecology and EvolutioN, 7(10): 1217-1225spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva T. 2017. Species descriptions and digital environments: alternatives for accessibility of morphological data. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 61(4): 277– 281spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith K. 2008. A Brief History of NCBI’s Formation and Growth. In The NCBI Handbook. 2nd edition. Bethesda, United States. National Center for Biotechnology Information.spa
dc.relation.referencesSong H, Mu X, Wei M, Wang X, Luo J, Hu Y. 2015. Complete mitochondrial genome of the ocellate river stingray (Potamotrygon motoro). Mitochondrial DNA, 26(6): 857-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesSukumaran J, Knowles L. 2017. Multispecies coalescent delimits structure notspecies. PNAS, 114(1):1607–12.Tavares ES, Baker AJ. 2008. Single mitochondrial gene barcodes reliably identify sister-species in diverse clades of birds. BMC Evol Biol, 8(1): 81.spa
dc.relation.referencesThompson J.D, Higgins D.G, Gibson T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22(22): 4876-4880.spa
dc.relation.referencesToffoli D, Hrbek T, Araújo, Góes de M, Pinto de M, Charvet-Almeida P, Pires I. 2008. A test of the utility of DNA barcoding in the radiation of the freshwater stingray genus Potamotrygon (Potamotrygonidae, Myliobatiformes). Genetics and Molecular Biology, 31(1): 324-336spa
dc.relation.referencesToffoli D, Hrbek T, Araújo, Góes de M, Pinto de M, Charvet-Almeida P, Pires I. 2008. A test of the utility of DNA barcoding in the radiation of the freshwater stingray genus Potamotrygon (Potamotrygonidae, Myliobatiformes). Genetics and Molecular Biology, 31(1): 324-336spa
dc.relation.referencesWard R, Zemlak T, Innes B, Last P, Hebert P. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci, 360:1847–1857spa
dc.relation.referencesWard R, Hanner R, Hebert P. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol, 74(2):329–56.spa
dc.relation.referencesWesselingh F, Räsänen M, Irion G, Vonhof H, Kaandorp R, Renema W, Pitmann L, Gingras M. 2002. Lake Pebas: A palaeoecological reconstruction of a Miocene, long-lived lake complex in western Amazonia. Cainozoic Research, 1:35– 81.spa
dc.relation.referencesWesselingh F, Salo J. 2006. A Miocene perspective on the evolution of the Amazonian biota. Scripta Geologica, 133:439–458.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilson E. 2003. The encyclopedia of life. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18(1): 77–80.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang J, Hanner R. 2011. DNA barcoding is a useful tool for the identification of marine fishes from Japan. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 39(1): 31–42.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A. 2013. A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics, 29: 2869– 2876.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhao Y, Yi Z, Warren A, Song W. 2018. Species delimitation for the molecular taxonomy and ecology of the widely distributed microbial eukaryote genus Euplotes (Alveolata, Ciliophora). Proc Biol Sci, 285(1871):20172159.spa
dc.relation.referencesZemlak T, Ward R, Connell A, Holmes B, Hebert P. 2009. DNA barcoding reveals overlooked marine fishes. Mol Ecol Resour, 9(1): 237-42.spa
dc.relation.referencesZiesler R; Ardizzone G. 1979. Las aguas continentales de América Latina. FAO, Romespa
dc.rightsDerechos Reservados - Universidad de los Llanos, 2022spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-ND 4.0)spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/spa
dc.subject.armarcDegradación de hábitats
dc.subject.armarcBiodiversidad
dc.subject.proposalÁrbol ultramétricospa
dc.subject.proposalCuencas biogeograficasspa
dc.subject.proposalEspecies crípticasspa
dc.subject.proposalMOTUspa
dc.titleDelimitación de especies del género Potamotrygon (Garman, 1877) mediante el uso de secuencias del gen mitocondrial Citocromo Oxidasa I (COI)spa
dc.typeTrabajo de grado - Pregradospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/TPspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Miniatura
Nombre:
Trabajo de grado
Tamaño:
1.34 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
164003231
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
Carta de autorización
Tamaño:
20.76 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
164003231
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
Nota de aceptación
Tamaño:
530.78 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
164003231
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
414 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Tesis y Trabajos de Grado