Icono govco
 

Publicación:
Chlorella, ¿un potencial biofertilizante?

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz-Moreno, Martha L.spa
dc.contributor.authorSandoval-Parra, Karen X.spa
dc.contributor.authorSolarte-Murillo, Laura V.spa
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-16 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T17:42:36Z
dc.date.available2019-12-16 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-06-13T17:42:36Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-16
dc.description.abstractLas microalgas son organismos fotoautótrofos con un rápido crecimiento y la habilidad de adaptarse a diversos ambientes. Convierten el dióxido de carbono en biomasa y debido a esto, se considera que tienen gran potencial biotecnológico. La biomasa algal puede usarse en la industria alimenticia y de compuestos bioactivos, en la producción de biocombustibles, en la bioremediación y biofertilización. Como biofertilizantes, las microalgas clorofitas y cianofitas, producen polisacáridos (mucílago) que pueden evitar la erosión, mejorar la estructura y el contenido de material orgánica de los suelos, y aumentar la concentración de iones en los cultivos. Reduciendo de esta forma la necesidad de fertilizantes químicos convencionales. El uso de estas microalgas como biofertilizantes se denomina algalización. Durante este proceso se usan principalmente clorofitas por su alta tasa de crecimiento, la facilidad de su cultivo a gran escala, y su adaptación a las condiciones del suelo. El género Chlorella es de gran interés porque diversos estudios han mostrado que puede ayudar en la fijación del nitrógeno, mejorar las propiedades físicas y químicas del suelo, y producir sustancias que promueven el desarrollo de la planta y el control de infecciones. Por esta razón, las microalgas del género Chlorella representan una alternativa viable para la biofertilización, generando beneficios no solo para la producción agrícola sino también para el medio ambiente.spa
dc.description.abstractMicroalgae are photoautotrophic organisms with fast growth and the ability to adapt to different environments. They convert carbon dioxide into biomass and are considered to have great biotechnological potential because of it. Algal biomass can be used in food and bioactive compounds industry, in biofuels production, in bioremediation and biofertilization. As biofertilizers, chlorophytes and cyanophytes microalgae produce polysaccharides (mucilage) that can avoid erosion, improve the structure and organic matter content in the soil, and increase the ions concentration for crop plants. Thus, reducing the need for conventional crop chemical fertilizers. The use of this microalgae as biofertilizers is called algalization. Algalization uses mainly chlorophytes due to their high growth rate, their simple large scale cultivation, and their adaptation to soil conditions. Chlorella genus is of special interest because research has shown that it can help with nitrogen fixation, improve physical and chemical properties of the soil, and produce substances that can promote plant development and infections control. Therefore, microalgae from Chlorella genus are a viable alternative for biofertilization, generating benefits for agricultural production and the environment.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doi10.22579/20112629.582
dc.identifier.eissn2011-2629
dc.identifier.issn0121-3709
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/2740
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.22579/20112629.582
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de los Llanosspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://orinoquia.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/orinoquia/article/download/582/pdf
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 2 , Año 2019spa
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationvolume23spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalOrinoquiaspa
dc.relation.referencesAbd Elhafz A, Abd Elhafz A, Gaur SS, Hamdany N, Osman M, Lakshmi TVR. Recent Res Sci Technol. 2015;7:14-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesAdessia A, De Carvalhoc RC, De Philippisa R, Branquinhoc C, Da Silva JM. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances improve water retention indryland biological soil crusts. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;116:67-69.spa
dc.relation.referencesAgwa OK, Ogugbue CJ, Williams EE. Field Evidence of Chlorella vulgaris potentials as a biofertilizer for Hibiscus esculentus. Int J Agric Res. 2017;12(4):181-189.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Shakankery FM, Hamouda RA, Ammar MM. The promotive effect of different concentrations of marine algae as biofertilizers on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) plants. J chem Biol Phys Sci. 2014; 4:43201-43211.spa
dc.relation.referencesAntoninka A, Bowker MA, Reed SC, Doherty K. Production of greenhouse-grown biocrust mosses and associated cyanobacteria to rehabilitate dryland soil function: cultivating biocrust mosses. Restor Ecol. 2016;24:324-335. DOI: 10.1111/rec.12311spa
dc.relation.referencesArce MI, Méndoza-Lera C, Almagro M, Catalán N, Romaní A, Martí E, Gómez R, et al. A conceptual framework for understanding the biogeochemistry of dry riverbeds through the lens of soil science. Earth-Sci Rev. 2019;188:441-453.spa
dc.relation.referencesAwale R, Machado S, Ghimire R, Bista P. 2017. Soil Health. In: Yorgey G, Kruger C, (Editors). Advances in dryland farming in the Inland Pacifc Northwest. Washington State University. p. 47-98.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaumann K, Glaser K, Mutz JE, Karsten U, Maclennan A, Hu Y, Michalikd D, et al. Biological soil crusts of temperate forests: Their role in P cycling. Soil Biol Biochem. 2017;109:156-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.02.011spa
dc.relation.referencesBeltrame A, Pascholati SF. Cianobactérias e algas reduzem os sintomas causados por Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) em plantas de fumo. Summa Phytopathol. 2011;37(2):140-145.spa
dc.relation.referencesBileva T. Influence of green algae Chlorella vulgaris on infested Xiphinema index grape seedlings. J Earth Sci Clim Change. 2013;4:136-138.spa
dc.relation.referencesBleakley S, Hayes M. Algal proteins: extraction, application, and challenges concerning production. Foods. 2017;6:33.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorchhardt N, Baum C, Mikhailyuk T, Karsten U. Biological soil crusts of Arctic Svalbard - Water availability as potential controlling factor for microalgal biodiversity. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1485. DOI: 1485. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01485spa
dc.relation.referencesChacón TL. 2010. Efecto de la aplicación de soluciones de Chlorella vulgaris y Scenedesmus obliquus sobre el contenido de compuestos funcionales en germinados de brócoli (Brassica oleracea var itálica). Magister en diseño y gestión de procesos, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de la Sabana, Bogotá DC, Colombia. 106 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesChamizo S, Rodríguez-Caballero E, Román JR, Cantón Y. Effects of biocrust on soil erosion and organic carbon losses under natural rainfall. Catena. 2016;148(2): 117-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.017spa
dc.relation.referencesChen X, He G, Deng Z, Wang N, Jiang W, Chen S. Screening of microalgae for biodiesel feedstock. Adv Microbiol. 2014a;4:365-376.spa
dc.relation.referencesChen L, Rossi F, Deng S, Liu Y, Wang G, Adessi A, De Philippis R. Macromolecular and chemical features of the excreted extracellular polysaccharides in induced biological soil crusts of different ages. J Arid Environ. 2014b;67:521-527.spa
dc.relation.referencesCólica G, Li H, Rossi F, Li D, Liu Y, De Philippis R. Microbial secreted exopolysaccharides affect the hydrological behavior of induced biological soil crusts in desert sandy soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2014;68:62-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.09.017spa
dc.relation.referencesDineshkumar R, Kumaravel R, Gopalsamy J, Sikder MNA, Sampathkumar P. Microalgae as bio-fertilizers for rice growth and seed yield productivity. Waste Biomass Valor. 2018;9(5):793-800. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-017-9873-5spa
dc.relation.referencesDineshkumar R, Subramanian J, Gopalsamy J, Jayasingam P, Arumugam A, Kannadasan S, Sampathkumar P. The impact of using microalgae as biofertilizer in maize (Zea mays L.). Waste Biomass Valor. 2017;8:1-10. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-017-0123-7spa
dc.relation.referencesDubey A, Dubey DK. 2010. Evaluation of cost effective organic fertilizer. Organic eprints. http://orgprints.org/17043/1/17043.pdf (5 March, 2019).spa
dc.relation.referencesElarroussia H, Elmernissia N, Benhimaa R, Isam MEK, Najib B, Abedelaziz S, Imane W. Microalgae polysaccharides a promising plant growth biostimulant. J Algal Biomass Util. 2016;7:55-63.spa
dc.relation.referencesEl Modafar C, Elgadda M, El Boutachfaitib R, Abouraicha E, Zehhara N, Petit E, et al. Induction of natural defence accompanied by salicylic aciddependant systemic acquired resistance in tomato seedlings in response to bioelicitors isolated from green algae. Sci Hort. 2012;138:55-63. doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.02.011spa
dc.relation.referencesEl-Sheekh MM, Khairy HM, El-Shenody R. Algal production of extra and intra-cellular polysaccharides as an adaptive response to the toxin crude extract of Microcystis aeruginosa. Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2012;9(1):10. DOI: 10.1186/1735-2746-9-10spa
dc.relation.referencesFaheed FA, Fattah ZA. Effect of Chlorella vulgaris as bio-fertilizer on growth parameters and metabolic aspects of lettuce plant. J Agric Soc Sci. 2008;4:165-169.spa
dc.relation.referencesFelde VJMNL, Chamizo S, Felix-Henningsen P, Drahorad SL. What stabilizes biological soil crusts in the Negev Desert?. Plant soil. 2018;429(1-2):9-18. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-017-3459-7spa
dc.relation.referencesFischer T, Veste M, Bens O, Hüttl RF. Dew formation on the surface of biological soil crusts in central european sand ecosystems. Biogeosciences Discussions. 2012;9:8075-8092.spa
dc.relation.referencesGhiloufi W, Büdel B, Chaieb M. Effects of biological soil crusts on a mediterranean perennial grass (Stipatanacissima, L.). Plant Biosyst. 2016;151:158-167. DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2015.1118165spa
dc.relation.referencesGhosh AK. Functions and bio-functions of soil and its restoration. IJRAR - Int J Res Anal Rev. 2018;5(3):672-677.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrzzesik M, Romanowska-Duda Z. Improvements germination, growth, and metabolic activity of corn seedlings by grain conditioning and root application with cyanobacteria and microalgae. Pol J Environ Stud. 2014;23:1147-1153.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrzzesik M, Romanowska-Duda Z. Ability of Cyanobacteria and green algae to improve metabolic activity and development of willow plants. Pol J Environ Stud. 2015;24(3): 1003-1012. DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/34667spa
dc.relation.referencesGrzzesik M, Romanowska-Duda Z, Kalaji HM. Effectiveness of cyanobacteria and green algae in enhancing the photosynthetic performance and growth of willow (Salix viminalis L.) plants under limited synthetic fertilizers application. Photosynthetica. 2017;55:510-521.spa
dc.relation.referencesHajimahmoodi M, Faramarzi MA, Mohammadi N, Soltani N, Oveisi MR, Nafissi-Varcheh N. Evaluation of antioxidant properties and total phenolic contents of some strains of microalgae. J Appl Phycol. 2010;22:43-50.spa
dc.relation.referencesHussain A, Hasnain S. Comparative assessment of the efficacy of bacterial and cyanobacterial phytohormones in plant tissue culture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28(4):1459-1466.spa
dc.relation.referencesHussain A, Krischke M, Roitsch T, Hasnain S. Rapid determination of cytokinins and auxins in cyanobacteria. Curr Microbiol. 2010;6(5)1:361-369.spa
dc.relation.referencesIyovo GD, Du G, Chen J. Sustainable biomethane, biofertilizer and biodiesel system from poultry waste. Indian J Sci Technol. 2010;3(10):1062-1069.spa
dc.relation.referencesKholssi R, Marks EAN, Miñón J, Montero O, Debdoubi A, Rad C. Biofertilizing efect of Chlorella sorokiniana suspensions on wheat growth. J Plant Growth Regul. 2018; 1-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00344-018-9879-7spa
dc.relation.referencesKim MJ, Shim CK, Kim YK, Ko BG, Park JH, Hwang SG, Kim BH. Effect of biostimulator, Chlorella fusca on improving growth and qualities of chinese chives and spinach in organic farm. Plant Pathol J. 2018;34(6):567-574. DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.FT.11.2018.0254spa
dc.relation.referencesKim MJ, Shim CK, Kim YK, Park JH, Hong SJ, Ji HJ, Han EJ, Yoon JC. Effect of Chlorella vulgaris CHK0008 fertilization on enhancement of storage and freshness in organic strawberry and leaf vegetables. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol. 2014;32:872-878.spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar D, Purakayastha TJ, Shivay YS. Long-term effect of organic manures and biofertilizers on physical and chemical properties of soil and productivity of rice-wheat system. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management (IJBSM). 2015; 6(2):176-181. DOI: 10.5958/0976-4038.2015.00030.5spa
dc.relation.referencesLan SB, Hu CX, Rao BQ, Wu L, Zhang DL, Liu YD. Non-rainfall water sources in the topsoil and their changes during formation of man-made algal crusts at the eastern edge of Qubqi Desert, Inner Mongolia. Sci China Life Sci. 2010;53:1135-1141.spa
dc.relation.referencesLan S, Zhang Q, Wu L, Liu Y, Zhang D, Hu C. Artificially accelerating the reversal of desertification: cyanobacterial inoculation facilitates the succession of vegetation communities. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:307-315. DOI: 10.1021/es403785jspa
dc.relation.referencesLin CS, Chou TL, Wu JT. Biodiversity of soil algae in the farmlands of mid-taiwan. Bot Stud. 2013;54:41. DOI: 10.1186/1999-3110-54-41spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu J, Chen F. Biology and industrial applications of Chlorella: Advances and prospects. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2016a;153:1-35.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu L, Pohnert G, Wei D. Extracellular metabolites from industrial microalgae and their biotechnological potential. Mar Drugs. 2016b;14(10):191. DOI: 10.3390/md14100191spa
dc.relation.referencesMager DM. Carbohydrates in cyanobacterial soil crusts as a source of carbon in the Southwest Kalahari, Botswana. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42:313-318. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.009spa
dc.relation.referencesMager DM, Thomas AD. Extracellular polysaccharides from cyanobacterial soil crusts: a review of their role in dryland soil processes. J Arid Environ. 2011;75:91-97.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaqubela M, Mnkeni P, Malam Issa O, Pardo M, D’Acqui L. Nostoc cyanobacterial inoculation in South African agricultural soils enhances soil structure, fertility, and maize growth. Plant Soil. 2009;315:79-92.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaqubela MP, Muchaonyerwa P, Mnkeni NS. Inoculation effects of two south african cyanobacteria strains on aggregate stability of a silt loam soil. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11:10726-10735.spa
dc.relation.referencesMohamed ZA. Polysaccharides as a protective response against microcystin-induced oxidative stress in Chlorella vulgaris and scenedesmus quadricauda and their possible significance in the aquatic ecosystem. Ecotoxicology. 2008;17(6): 504-516. DOI: 10.1007/s10646-008-0204-2spa
dc.relation.referencesMoreno-García L, Adjallé K, Barnabé S, Raghavan G. Microalgae biomass production for a biorefinery system: recent advances and the way towards sustainability. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;76:493-506.spa
dc.relation.referencesNain L, Rana A, Joshi M, Jadhav SD, Kumar D, Shivay YS, Paul S, Prasanna R. Evaluation of synergistic effects of bacterial and cyanobacterial strains as biofertilizers for wheat. Plant soil. 2010;331:217.spa
dc.relation.referencesOdjadjare EC, Mutanda T, Olaniran AO. Potential biotechnological application of microalgae: a critical review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2017;37(1):37-52. DOI: 10.3109/07388551.2015.1108956spa
dc.relation.referencesOsman M, El-Sheekh M, El-Naggar A, Gheda S. Effect of two species of cyanobacteria as biofertilizers on some metabolic activities, growth, and yield of pea plant. Biol Fertil Soils. 2010;46:861-875.spa
dc.relation.referencesÖzdemir S, Sukatar A, Öztekin GB. Production of Chlorella vulgaris and its effects on plant growth, yield and fruit quality of organic tomato grown in greenhouse as biofertilizer. J Agric Sci. 2016;22:596-605.spa
dc.relation.referencesPemmaraju D, Appidi T, Minhas G, Singh SP, Khan N, Pal M, Srivastava R, Rengan AK. Chlorophyll rich biomolecular fraction of a cadamba loaded into polymeric nanosystem coupled with photothermal therapy: a synergistic approach for cancer theranostics. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;110:383-391.spa
dc.relation.referencesRana A, Joshi M, Prasanna R, Shivay RS, Nain L. Biofortification of wheat through inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and cyanobacteria. Eur J Soil Biol. 2012;50:118.spa
dc.relation.referencesRajasekaran S, Sundaramoorthy P, Sankar GK. Effect of FYM, N, P fertilizers and biofertilizers on germination and growth of paddy (Oryza sativa L.). Int Lett Nat Sci. 2015;35:59-65.spa
dc.relation.referencesRaposo MFDJ, De Morais RMSC. Chlorella vulgaris as soil amendment: influence of encapsulation and enrichment with rhizobacteria. Int J Agric Biol. 2011;13:719-724.spa
dc.relation.referencesRaposo MF, De Morais RM, Bernardo de Morais AM. Bioactivity and applications of sulphated polysaccharides from marine microalgae. Mar Drugs. 2013;11(1): 233-252. DOI:10.3390/md11010233spa
dc.relation.referencesRizwan M, Mujtaba G, Memon SA, Lee K, Rashid N. Exploring the potential of microalgae for new biotechnology applications and beyond: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2018;92:394-404. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.034spa
dc.relation.referencesRomanowska-Duda ZB, Grzesik M, Owczarczyk A, Mazur-Marzec H. 2010. Impact of intra and extracellular substances fromcyanobacteria on the growth and physiological parameters of grapevine (Vitis vinifera). In: 20th International Conference on Plant Growth Substance (IPGSA), book of abstracts 28.07- 02.08.2010. Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Tarragona, Spain, 118.spa
dc.relation.referencesSahu D, Priyadarshani L, Rath B. Cyanobacteria as potential biofertilizer. CIBTech Journal of Microbiology. 2012;1(2-3):20-26.spa
dc.relation.referencesSassi KKB, Silva JA, Calixto CD, Sassi R, Sassi CFC. Metabolites of interest for food technology produced by microalgae from the Northeast Brazil. Rev Ciênc Agron. 2019;50(1):54-65. DOI: 10.5935/1806-6690.20190007spa
dc.relation.referencesSchreiber C, Henning S, Lucy H, Christoph B, Bärbel A, Josefne K, Silvia DS, et al. Evaluating potential of green alga Chlorella vulgaris to accumulate phosphorus and to fertilize nutrient-poor soil substrates for crop plants. J Appl Psychol. 2018; 30(5):2827-2836spa
dc.relation.referencesShanan NT, Higazy AM. Integrated biofertilization management and cyanobacteria application to improven growth and flower quality of Matthiola incana. Res J Agric Biol Sci. 2009;5(6):1162-1168.spa
dc.relation.referencesSubashchandrabose SR, Ramakrishnan B, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Naidu R. Consortia of cyanobacteria/microalgae and bacteria: biotechnological potential. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29(6):896-907. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.009spa
dc.relation.referencesSuganya T, Varman M, Masjuki HH, Renganathan S. Macroalgae and microalgae as a potential source for commercial applications along with biofuels production: a biorefinery approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2016;55:909-941. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.026spa
dc.relation.referencesTaher MT, Mohamed AY. Improvement of growth parameters of Zea mays and properties of soil inoculated with two Chlorella species. Rep Opinion. 2015;7: 22-27.spa
dc.relation.referencesTarkowski P, Ge LY, Yong JWH, Tan SN. Analytical methods for cytokinins. Trends Anal Chem. 2009;28:323-335.spa
dc.relation.referencesTripathi RD, Dwivedi S, Shukla MK, Mishra S, Srivastava S, Singh R. Role of blue green algae biofertilizer in ameliorating the nitrogen demand and fly-ash stress to the growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants. Chemosphere. 2008;70: 1919-1928. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.038spa
dc.relation.referencesVenkataraman, GS. 1972. Algal biofertilizers and rice cultivation, Today and Tommorrow’s. New Delhi. Pp 71.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang SK, Hu YR, Wang F, Stiles AR, Liu CZ. Scale-up cultivation of Chlorella ellipsoidea from indoor to outdoor in bubble column bioreactors. Bioresource Technology. 2014;156:117-122.spa
dc.relation.referencesWells ML, Potin P, Craigie JS, Raven JA, Merchant SS, Helliwell KE, et al. Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: revisiting our understanding. J Appl Phycol. 2017;29:949-982.spa
dc.relation.referencesWijffels RH, Kruse O, Hellingwerf KJ. Potential of industrial biotechnology with cyanobacteria and eukaryotic microalgae. Curr Opin Biotech. 2013;4(3):405-413. DOI:10.1016/j.copbio.2013.04.004spa
dc.relation.referencesWilliams L, Loewen-Schneider K, Maier S, Büdel B. Cyanobacterial diversity of western european biological soil crusts along a latitudinal gradient. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92(10): fiw157. DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiw157spa
dc.relation.referencesZayadan BK, Matorin DN, Baimakhanova GB, Bolathan K, Oraz GD, Sadanov AK. Promising microbial consortia for producing biofertilizers for rice fields. Microbiology. 2014;83:391-397.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhuang WW, Downing A, Zhang YM. The influence of biological soil crust on 15 N traslocation in soil and vascular plant in a temperate desert of Nortwest China. J Plant Ecol. 2014;8:1-9.spa
dc.rightsOrinoquia - 2020spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://orinoquia.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/orinoquia/article/view/582spa
dc.subjectpathological diagnosiseng
dc.subjectblackberryeng
dc.subjectpathogeneng
dc.subjectdiseaseeng
dc.subjectDiagnosticospa
dc.subjectMora de Castillaspa
dc.subjectPatógenospa
dc.subjectenfermedadesspa
dc.titleChlorella, ¿un potencial biofertilizante?spa
dc.title.translatedChlorella, a potential biofertilizer?eng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal Articleeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localSección Ciencias agrariasspa
dc.type.localSección Agricultural scienceseng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Colecciones

Revista Orinoquia