Icono govco
 

Publicación:
Análisis de la producción de biomasa de Nostoc muscorum en sistema hidropónico

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz-Moreno, Martha L.spa
dc.contributor.authorSolarte-Murillo, Laura V.spa
dc.contributor.authorSandoval-Parra, Karen X.spa
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-11 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T17:42:39Z
dc.date.available2020-05-11 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-06-13T17:42:39Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-11
dc.description.abstractNostoc es un género de cianobacterias filamentosas con aplicaciones biotecnológicas en nutrición humana, biomedicina, biofertilización y producción comercial de biocombustibles. Sin embargo, su baja tasa de crecimiento en medio líquido por su naturaleza perifítica y su tendencia a formar biofilms, limita su producción a gran escala. Por lo tanto, el objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la producción de biomasa de Nostoc muscorum en un sistema hidropónico modificado. Para ello, se realizaron cultivos de N. muscorum por triplicado, en un sistema hidropónico bajo condiciones semicontroladas de temperatura (29 ± 13°C), intensidad lumínica (32 ± 54 μmol/m2/s) y fotoperiodo (12 horas), durante 23 días en un invernadero. La temperatura, el pH, la conductividad eléctrica y la producción de biomasa seca, fueron monitoreados en días alternados. Los resultados arrojaron que la producción máxima de biomasa seca fue de 0.2276 ± 0.0114 g/m2/día, y la productividad promedio fue de 0.4149 ± 0.0207 g/m2/día. A su vez, la producción máxima de biomasa de N. muscorum se obtuvo el día trece con 0.3185 ± 0.0159 g/m2/día. El análisis estadístico de correlación de variables ambientales no arrojó diferencias significativas, por lo que la temperatura, el pH y la conductividad eléctrica no afectaron la producción de biomasa de N. muscorum. Consecuentemente, el crecimiento algal fue influenciado por la fisiología de la especie. El soporte empleado en el sistema hidropónico permitió la adherencia y el desarrollo de la capa mucilaginosa de la cianobacteria sin requerir períodos de desecación como en los cultivos convencionales. El sistema hidropónico proporcionó un flujo continuo de nutrientes que podría prevenir el ataque de bacterias y hongos oportunistas, generando una alta tasa de crecimiento. De este modo, este sistema hidropónico representa una alternativa viable para la producción de biomasa de N. muscorum en condiciones de invernadero a gran escala.spa
dc.description.abstractNostoc is a genus of filamentous cyanobacteria with biotechnological applications in human nutrition, biomedicine, biofertilization and commercial production of biofuels. However, the low growth rate in liquid medium due to its periphytic nature and its tendency to form biofilms, limits its large-scale production. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the biomass production of Nostoc muscorum in a modified hydroponic system. Cultures of N. muscorum were made by triplicate, in a hydroponic system under semicontrolled conditions of temperature (29 ± 13 °C), light intensity (32 ± 54 μmol/m2/s) and photoperiod (12 hours), for a total of 23 days inside a greenhouse. Temperature, pH, conductivity and dry biomass production were monitored on alternating days. The results showed that the maximum dry biomass production was 0.2276 ± 0.0114 g/m2/day, and the average productivity was 0.4149 ± 0.0207 g/m2/day. The maximum biomass production of N. muscorum was achieved on day thirteen with 0.3185 ± 0.0159 g/m2/day. The correlation statistical analysis of environmental variables did not show significant differences; thus, temperature, pH and electrical conductivity did not affect the biomass production of N. muscorum. Consequently, the algal growth was influenced by the species physiology only. The support used in the hydroponic system allowed the adhesion and development of the algae mucilaginous layer without requiring drying periods as in conventional crops. The hydroponic system provided a continuous flow of nutrients that could prevent the attack of opportunistic bacteria and fungi, generating a high growth rate of N. muscorum. The hydroponic system represents a viable alternative for the production of N. muscorum biomass under greenhouse conditions at large scale.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfeng
dc.identifier.doi10.22579/20112629.599
dc.identifier.eissn2011-2629
dc.identifier.issn0121-3709
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/2750
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.22579/20112629.599
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de los Llanosspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://orinoquia.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/orinoquia/article/download/599/pdf
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 1 , Año 2020spa
dc.relation.citationendpage31
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage23
dc.relation.citationvolume24spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalOrinoquiaspa
dc.relation.referencesAbdel-Raouf N, Al-Homaidan AA, Ibraheem IBM. Microalgae and wastewater treatment. Saudi J Biol Sci, 2012;19: 257–275.eng
dc.relation.referencesAlatorre-Cobos F, Calderón-Vázquez C, Ibarra-Laclette E, Yong-Villalobos L, Pérez-Torres CA, Oropeza-Aburto A, Méndez-Bravo A, et al. An improved, low-cost, hydroponic system for growing Arabidopsis and other plant species under aseptic conditions. BMC Plant Biol, 2014;14(1):69. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-69.eng
dc.relation.referencesAnsari S, Fatma T. Cyanobacterial polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB): Screening, optimization and characterization. PLoS One, 2016;11(6).e0158168 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158168.eng
dc.relation.referencesBabu S, Prasanna R, Bidyarani N, Singh R. Analysing the colonisation of inoculated cyanobacteria in wheat plants using biochemical and molecular tools. J Appl Phycol, 2015;1:327-338.eng
dc.relation.referencesBarone V, Puglisi I, Fragalà F, Lo Piero AR, Giuffrida F, Baglieri A. Novel bioprocess for the cultivation of microalgae in hydroponic growing system of tomato plants. J Appl Phycol, 2019;31:465-470. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-018-1518-y.eng
dc.relation.referencesBawiec A, Garbowski T, Pawęska K, Pulikowski K. Analysis of the algae growth dynamics in the hydroponic system with LEDs nighttime lighting using the laser granulometry method. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2019;228(9):366.eng
dc.relation.referencesBenítez REH, Vidal DRA, Guerrero JV. Efecto de la inoculación de cianobacterias en cultivos de interés comercial en zonas semiáridas de La Guajira-Colombia. Rev Colomb Investig Agroin, 2018;5(1):20-31. DOI: 10.23850/issn.2422-0582.eng
dc.relation.referencesBharti A, Prasanna R, Kumar G, Kumar A, Nain L. Co-cultivation of cyanobacteria for raising nursery of chrysanthemum using a hydroponic system. J Appl Phycol, 2019;31:3625-3635. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-019-01830-9.eng
dc.relation.referencesBidyarani N, Prasanna R, Chawla G, Babu S, Singh RM. Deciphering the factors associated with the colonization of rice plants by cyanobacteria. J Basic Microbiol, 2015;55:407-419.eng
dc.relation.referencesCui L, Xu H, Zhu Z, Gao X. The effects of the exopolysaccharide and growth rate on the morphogenesis of the terrestrial filamentous cyanobacterium Nostoc flagelliforme. Biol Open, 2017;6(9):1329-1335. DOI: 10.1242/bio.026955.eng
dc.relation.referencesDhar DW, Prasanna R, Pabbi S, Vishwakarma R. 2015. Significance of cyanobacteria as inoculants in agriculture. In: Das D (Editor). Algal biorefinery: An integrated approach. Springer, Cham. p. 339-374.eng
dc.relation.referencesDiao Y, Yang Z. Evaluation of morphological variation and biomass growth of Nostoc commune under laboratory conditions. J Environ Biol, 2014;35(3):485-489.eng
dc.relation.referencesFerroni L, Klisch M, Pancaldi S, Häder DP. Complementary UV-absorption of mycosporine-like amino acids and scytonemin is responsible for the UV-insensitivity of photosynthesis in Nostoc flagelliforme. Mar Drugs, 2010;8(1): 106-121. DOI: 10.3390/md8010106.eng
dc.relation.referencesFlores E, López‐Lozano A, Herrero A. 2015. Nitrogen fixation in the oxygenic phototrophic prokaryotes (cyanobacteria): the fight against oxygen. In: de Bruijn FJ (Editor). Biological Nitrogen Fixation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 879-890. DOI: 10.1002/9781119053095.ch86.eng
dc.relation.referencesGuo M, Ding GB, Yang P, Zhang L, Wu H, Li H, Li Z. Migration suppression of small cell lung cancer by polysaccharides from Nostoc commune Vaucher. J Agric Food Chem, 2016;64(32):6277-6285. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01906.eng
dc.relation.referencesHaase SM, Huchzermeyer B, Rath T. PHB accumulation in Nostoc muscorum under different carbon stress situations. J Appl Phycol, 2012;24(2):157-162. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-011-9663-6.eng
dc.relation.referencesHultberg M, Carlsson AS, Gustafsson S. Treatment of drainage solution from hydroponic greenhouse production with microalgae. Bioresour Technol, 2013;136:401-406.eng
dc.relation.referencesKim KR, Na JU, Lee SH, Oh DK. Selective production of 9R-Hydroxy-10E,12Z,15Z-Octadecatrienoic acid from α-linolenic acid in perilla seed oil hydrolyzate by a lipoxygenase from Nostoc sp. SAG 25.82. PLoS One, 2015;10(9):e0137785. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137785.eng
dc.relation.referencesLenzi A, Baldi A, Tesi R. Growing spinach in a floating system with different volumes of aerated or non aerated nutrient solution. Adv Hortic Sci, 2011;25(1):21-25. Retrieved March 26, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/42882804.eng
dc.relation.referencesLiao HF, Wu TJ, Tai JL, Chi MC, Lin LL. Immunomodulatory potential of the polysaccharide-rich extract from edible cyanobacterium Nostoc commune. Med Sci (Basel), 2015;3(4):112-123. DOI: 10.3390/medsci3040112.eng
dc.relation.referencesLotfi H, Hejazi MA, Heshmati MK, Mohammadi SA, Zarghami N. Optimizing expression of antiviral cyanovirin-N homology gene using response surface methodology and protein structure prediction. Cell Mol Biol, 2017;63(9):96-105. DOI: 10.14715/cmb/2017.63.9.17.eng
dc.relation.referencesNowruzi B, Haghighat S, Fahimi H, Mohammadi E. Nostoc cyanobacteria species: a new and rich source of novel bioactive compounds with pharmaceutical potential. Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research (IJPHR), 2018;9(1):5-12. DOI: 10.1111/jphs.12202.eng
dc.relation.referencesPrasanna R, Saxena G, Singh B, Ranjan K, Buddhadeo R, Velmourougane K, et al. Mode of application influences the biofertilizing efficacy of cyanobacterial biofilm formulations in chrysanthemum varieties under protected cultivation. Open Agric, 2018;3:478-489.eng
dc.relation.referencesRaja R, Hemaiswarya S, Ganesan V, Carvalho IS. Recent developments in therapeutic applications of Cyanobacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol, 2016;42(3):394-405. DOI:10.3109/1040841X.2014.957640.eng
dc.relation.referencesRanjan K, Priya H, Ramakrishnan B, Prasanna R, Venkatachalam S, Thapa S, Tiwari R, Nain L, Singh R, Shivay YS. Cyanobacterial inoculation modifies the rhizosphere microbiome of rice planted to a tropical alluvial soil. Appl Soil Ecol, 2016;108:195-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.08.010.eng
dc.relation.referencesRosales-Loaiza N, Vera P, Aiello-Mazzarri C, Morales E. Comparative growth and biochemical composition of four strains of Nostoc and Anabaena (Cyanobacteria, Nostocales) in relation to sodium nitrate. Acta Biolo Colomb, 2016;21(2):347-354. DOI: 10.15446/abc.v21n2.48883.eng
dc.relation.referencesRossi F, De Philippis R. Role of cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides in phototrophic biofilms and in complex microbial mats. Life, 2015;5(2):1218-1238. DOI: 10.3390/life5021218.eng
dc.relation.referencesRusydi R, Yakupitiyage A, Gallardo WG, Dabbadie L, Anal AK. Potential of Nostoc muscorum cultured in BG-11 medium as biodiesel feedstock source: evaluation of nutrient requirement for culture and its daily lipid content. KnE Life Sci, 2015;1:103-113. DOI: 10.18502/kls.v1i0.93.eng
dc.relation.referencesShah V, Garg N, Madamwar D. Ultrastructure of the cyanobacterium Nostoc muscorum and exploitation of the culture for hydrogen production. Folia Microbiol, 2003;48:65. DOI: 10.1007/BF02931278eng
dc.relation.referencesSingh SP, Pathak J, Sinha RP. Cyanobacterial factories for the production of green energy and value-added products: An integrated approach for economic viability. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 2017;69:578-595. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.110.eng
dc.relation.referencesSingh VP, Srivastava PK, Prasad SM. Differential physiological and biochemical responses of two cyanobacteria Nostoc muscorum and Phormidium foveolarum against oxyfluorfen and UV-B radiation. Ecotox Environ Safe, 2011;74(7):1981-1993. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.07.006.eng
dc.relation.referencesVaara T, Vaara M, Niemelä S. Two improved methods for obtaining axenic cultures of cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1979;38 (5): 1011-1014.eng
dc.relation.referencesVerseux C, Baqué M, Lehto K, de Vera JP, Rothschild LJ, Billi D. Sustainable life support on Mars–the potential roles of cyanobacteria. Int J Astrobiol, 2016;15(1):65-92. DOI: 10.1017/ S147355041500021X.eng
dc.relation.referencesVorndran E, Lindberg P. In situ-immobilization of two model cyanobacterial strains in ceramic structures: A new biohybrid material for photobioreactor applications. J Biotechnol, 2016;223:1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.02.024.eng
dc.relation.referencesWehr JD, Sheath RG, Kociolek JP. 2015. Freshwater algae of North America: ecology and classification. 2nd ed. Elsevier, Academic Press, USA. p. 1050.eng
dc.relation.referencesWidder S, Allen RJ, Pfeiffer T, Curtis TP, Wiuf C, Sloan WT, Cordero OX, et al. Challenges in microbial ecology: building predictive understanding of community function and dynamics. ISME J, 2016;11:2557-2568. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2016.45.eng
dc.relation.referencesYe J, Song Z, Wang L, Zhu J. Metagenomic analysis of microbiota structure evolution in phytoremediation of a swine lagoon wastewater. Bioresour Technol, 2016;219: 439–444.eng
dc.relation.referencesYu H, Jia S, Dai Y. Growth characteristics of the cyanobacterium Nostoc flagelliforme in photoautotrophic, mixotrophic and heterotrophic cultivation. J Appl Psychol, 2009;21(1):127. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-008-9341-5.eng
dc.relation.referencesZhang J, Wang X, Zhou Q. Co-cultivation of Chlorella spp and tomato in a hydroponic system. Biomass Bioenergy, 2017;97:132-138.eng
dc.rightsOrinoquia - 2020eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2eng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.sourcehttps://orinoquia.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/orinoquia/article/view/599eng
dc.titleAnálisis de la producción de biomasa de Nostoc muscorum en sistema hidropónicospa
dc.title.translatedAnalysis of Nostoc muscorum biomass production in a hydroponic systemeng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal Articleeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85eng
dc.type.contentTexteng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.type.localSección Ciencias agrariasspa
dc.type.localSección Agricultural scienceseng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Colecciones

Revista Orinoquia