Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVelásquez-Penagos, José G.spa
dc.contributor.authorVelásquez-Penagos, José H.spa
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Parrado, Sonia Lucíaspa
dc.contributor.authorBarajas-Pardo, Diana Patriciaspa
dc.contributor.authorNeira-Rivera, Elianaspa
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz-Valdés, Cirospa
dc.contributor.authorOnofre-Rodríguez, Héctor G.spa
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-16 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T17:42:32Z
dc.date.available2019-12-16 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-06-13T17:42:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-16
dc.identifier.issn0121-3709
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/2728
dc.description.abstractEl objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el consumo de agua tratada proveniente de la producción petrolera en la calidad seminal del macho bovino reproductor, para ello se seleccionaron 16 toros entre 4 y 5 años distribuidos en dos grupos en los centros de investigaciones La Libertad de Agrosavia en Villavicencio y el Área de sostenibilidad agroenergetica, ASA en Acacias con disponibilidad de agua tratada de los campos petroleros, Apiay (A) y Castilla (C) respectivamente. Los animales seleccionados fueron distribuidos al azar para cada localidad en 4 tratamientos: 1) Consumo del 100 % agua de producción tratada; 2) consumo de mezcla 50 % agua de producción tratada y 50 % agua cruda; 3) consumo de mezcla 25 % agua de producción tratada y 75 % agua cruda; y 4) consumo 100 % agua cruda. Las variables consideradas fueron: calidad seminal para A y C determinadas por un sistema computarizado y de fertilidad in vitro para A evaluada por tinción fluorescente, Hoechst 33342. Los datos se analizaron estadística descriptiva, análisis de varianza (ANOVA) y pruebas de comparación de medias, Tukey, en un modelo de medidas repetidas en el tiempo. Los resultados indicaron, para calidad seminal, que los tratamientos que consumieron A y C en cada localidad presentaron diferencias (P < 0,05) para motilidad, 75,00±4,50, 69.24±4.13, espermatozoides motiles/100 células evaluadas, en el tratamiento dos respectivamente y en A para morfología, 76,67±2,06 espermatozoides normales/100 en el tratamiento cuatro, el índice de calidad espermática (ICE) no mostró diferencia (P > 0,05). Los resultados de unión espermatozoide - zona pelúcida mostraron diferencias entre tratamientos (P < 0,05), al igual que en fecundación in vitro, sin embargo, el comportamiento de estos cambios no indica asociación con el consumo de este tipo de agua. El estudio muestra que no se observan cambios contundentes o negativos que demuestren efecto en la fertilidad del toro por consumo de agua de producción tratada.spa
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to evaluate the consumption of treated water from oil production in the seminal quality of the breeding male; To this end, 16 bulls between 4 and 5 years old were selected, distributed in two groups at Agrosavia’s La Libertad centers in Villavicencio and the Agroenergetic Sustainability Area, ASA in Acacias with availability of treated water from the oil fields, Apiay (A) and Castilla (C) respectively. The selected animals were distributed randomly to each location in 4 treatments: 1) Consumption of 100% treated production water; 2) 50% consumption of treated production water and 50% raw water consumption; 3) mixing consumption 25% treated production water and 75% raw water; and 4) 100% raw water consumption. The variables considered were: seminal quality for A and C determined by a computerized system, and in vitro fertility for A evaluated by fluorescent staining, Hoechst 33342. The data were analyzed descriptive statistics, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means comparison tests, Tukey, in a model of measures repeated over time. The results indicated, for seminal quality, that the treatments that consumed A and C in each locality presented differences (P <0.05) for motility, 75.00 ± 4.50, 69.24 ± 4.13, motile sperm / 100 cells evaluated, in treatment two respectively and in A for morphology, 76.67 ± 2.06 normal sperm / 100 in treatment four, the sperm quality index (SQI) showed no difference (P> 0.05). The results of sperm-pellucid zone binding showed differences between treatments (P <0.05), as in in vitro fertilization, however, the behavior of these changes does not indicate an association with the consumption of this type of water. The study shows that there are no strong or negative changes that show an effect on the fertility of the bull due to the consumption of treated production water.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de los Llanosspa
dc.rightsOrinoquia - 2019spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://orinoquia.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/orinoquia/article/view/566spa
dc.subjectGonadotropineng
dc.subjectsex steroideng
dc.subjectgonadal maturationeng
dc.subjectfish reproductioneng
dc.subjectGonadotropinasspa
dc.subjectesteroides sexualesspa
dc.subjectmaduración gonadalspa
dc.subjectreproducción en pecesspa
dc.titleConsumo de agua tratada de producción petrolera en la fertilidad del bovino macho del sistema doble propósitospa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal Articleeng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localSección Ciencias agrariasspa
dc.type.localSección Agricultural scienceseng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.22579/20112629.566
dc.relation.referencesAlmansa E, Velásquez JG, Rodríguez GA. Efecto del uso de aguas provenientes de la producción petrolera en actividades agrícolas y pecuarias. Corpoica Cienc Tecnol Agropecu. 2018;19(2):403-420spa
dc.relation.referencesAnchieta MC, Vale Filho VR, Colosimo E, Sampaio IBM, Andrade VJ. Descarte e congelabilidade do sêmen de touros de raças zebuínas e taurinas em central de inseminação artificial no Brasil. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2005;57(2):196-204spa
dc.relation.referencesBarszcz K, Wiesetek D, Wasowick M, Kupczynska M. Bull semen collection and analysis for artificial insemination. J Agric Sci. 2012;4(3):1-10spa
dc.relation.referencesBerg HF, Kommisrud E, Bai G, Gaustad ER, Klinkenberg G, Standerholen FB, et al. Comparison of sperm adenosine triphosphate content, motility and fertility of immobilized and conventionally cryopreserved Norwegian Red bull semen. Theriogenology. 2018:121:181-187spa
dc.relation.referencesBurnett CR, Pratt SL, Long NM, Sell GS, Schrick FN. Assessment of semen quality and fertility in young growing beef bulls exposed to ergot alkaloids. Theriogenology 2018;118:219-224spa
dc.relation.referencesBraundmeier AG, Demers J, Shanks R, Saacke R, Miller D. Examination of the binding ability of bovine spermatozoa to the zona pellucida as an indicador of fertility. J Androl. 2002;23(5):645-651spa
dc.relation.referencesBlondin P, Beaulieu M, Fournier V, Morin M, Crawford L, Madan P, King WA. Analysis of bovine sexed sperm for IVF from sorting to the embryo. Theriogenology. 2009;71: 30-38spa
dc.relation.referencesBrito L. A Multilaboratory study on the variability of bovine semen analysis. Theriogenology. 2016;85(2):254-266spa
dc.relation.referencesCabrera P, Pantoja C. Viabilidad espermática e integridade del acrosoma em sêmen congelado de toros nacionales. Rev Investig Vet Perú. 2012;23(2):192-200spa
dc.relation.referencesCardozo JA, Velásquez JG, Rodríguez G, Prieto E, Tarazona G, Espitia A. 2002. Evaluación reproductiva del macho bovino en condiciones tropicales. Plan de modernización tecnológica de la ganadería colombiana. Manual técnico.spa
dc.relation.referencesChenoweth PJ, McPherson FJ. Bull breeding soundness, semen evaluation and cattle productivity. Anim Reprod Sci. 2016;169:32-36spa
dc.relation.referencesContri A, Valorz C, Faustini M, Wegher L, Carluccio A. Effect of sperm preparation on CASA motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2010;74: 424-435spa
dc.relation.referencesCoy P, Romar R, Payton R, McCann L, Saxton A, Edwards L. Maintenance of meiotic arrest in bovine oocytes using the S-enantiomer of roscovitine: effects on maturation, fertilization and subsequent embryo development in vitro. Reproduction. 2005;129(1):19-26spa
dc.relation.referencesFair S, Lonergan P. Review: Understanding the causes of variation in reproductive wastage among bulls. Animal. 2018;12(s1):s53-s62. Doi: 10.1017/S1751731118000964spa
dc.relation.referencesFelipe-Pérez YE, Juárez ML, Hernández EO, Valencia JJ. Viability of fresh and frozen bull sperm compared by two staining techniques. Acta Vet Bras. 2008;2(4):123-130spa
dc.relation.referencesFerraz MAMM, Morató R, Yeste M, Arcarons N, Pena AI, Tamargo C, et al. 2014. Evaluation of sperm subpopulation structure in relation to in vitro sperm-oocyte interaction of frozen-thawed semen from Holstein bulls. Theriogenology. 2014;81:1067-1072spa
dc.relation.referencesFlowers WL. Sperm characteristics that limit success of fertilization. J Anim Sci. 2013;9(7):3022-3029spa
dc.relation.referencesHidaka T, Fukumoto Y, Yamamoto S, Ogata Y, Horiuchi T. Variations in bovine embryo production between individual donors for OPU-IVF are closely related to glutathione concentrations in oocytes during in vitro maturation. Theriogenology. 2018;113:176-182spa
dc.relation.referencesKastelic JP, Thundathil JC. Breeding soundness evaluation and semen analysis for predicting bull fertility. Reprod Domest Anim. 2008;43(2):368-373spa
dc.relation.referencesKhalil WA, El-Harairy MA, Zeidan AE, Hassan MA, Mohey-Elsaeed O. Evaluation of bull spermatozoa during and after cryopreservation: Structural and ultrastructural insights. International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine. 2018;6:s49-s56spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira LZ, Paes de Arruda R, Cesar de Andrade AF, Carvalho Celeghini EC, Dos Santos RM, Beletti ME, et al. Assessment of field fertility and several in vitro sperm characteristics following the use of different Angus sires in a timed-AI program with suckled Nelore cows. Livest Sci. 2012;146:38-46spa
dc.relation.referencesOrantes MA, Vilaboa J, Ortega E, Córdova V. Comportamiento de los comercializadores de ganado bovino en la región Centro del estado de Chiapas. Quehacer Científico en Chiapas. 2010;1(9):51-56spa
dc.relation.referencesPáez EM, Corredor ES. Evaluación de la aptitud reproductiva del toro. Ciencia y Agricultura. 2014;11(2):49-59spa
dc.relation.referencesParkinson TJ. Evaluation of fertility and infertility in natural service bulls. Vet J. 2004;168(3):215-229. Doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2003.10.017spa
dc.relation.referencesPetherick JC. A review of some factors affecting the expression of libido in beef cattle, and individual bull and herd fertility. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2004;90:185-205spa
dc.relation.referencesPrinosilova P, Kopecká V, Hlavicová J, Kunetková M. Modified hypoosmotic swelling test for the assessment of boar and bull sperm sensitivity to cryopreservation. Acta Vet Brno. 2014;(83):313-319spa
dc.relation.referencesQuintero MA, Mayorga JM, Cardona MW. El análisis seminal como herramienta para predecir el potencial reproductivo en toros. Journal of veterinary andrology (JVA). 2017;2(1):30-37spa
dc.relation.referencesRestrepo BG, Úsuga SA, Rojano BA. Técnicas para el análisis de la fertilidad potencia del semen equino. CES Med Vet Zootec. 2013;8(1):69-81spa
dc.relation.referencesRosseto A. O uso de sondas fluorescentes na avaliação morfofuncional de espermatozóides bovinos. Rev Ciêne Agrár Belêm. 2005;43 junio/julio Suplementospa
dc.relation.referencesRuiz SB, Ruiz HH, Mendoza NP, Oliva MA, Gutiérrez MF, Rojas MRI, et al. Caracterización reproductiva de toros Bos taurus y Bos indicus y sus cruzas en un sistema de monta natural y sin reposo sexual en el trópico mexicano. Revista científica UDO Agrícola. 2010;10(1):94-102spa
dc.relation.referencesThundathil JC, Dance AL, Kastelic JP. Fertility management of bulls to improve beef cattle productivity. Theriogenology. 2016;86(1):397-405spa
dc.relation.referencesVejarano OA, Sanabria RD, Trujillo GA. Diagnóstico de la capacidad reproductiva de toros en ganaderías de tres municipios del alto Magdalena. Rev MVZ Córdoba 2005;10(2):648-662spa
dc.relation.referencesVelásquez JG, Canovas S, Barajas DP, Marcos J, Jiménes-Movilla M, Gutierrez R, et al. Role of Sialic Acid in Bovine Sperm–Zona Pellucida Binding. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007;74:617-628spa
dc.relation.referencesVelho ALC, Menezes E, Dinh T, Kaya A, Topper E, Moura AA, Memili E. Metabolomic markers of fertility in bull seminal plasma. Plos One. 2018;13(4):e0195279. doi: 10.1371 / journal.pone.0195279spa
dc.relation.referencesViana AGA, Martins AMA, Pontes AH, Fontes W, Castro MS, Ricart CAO, et al. Proteomic landscape of seminal plasma associated with dairy bull fertility. Nature. 2018(8):16323. Doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34152-wspa
dc.relation.referencesYániz JL, Palacín I, Vicente-Fiel S, Gosalvez J, López-Fernández C, Santolaria P. Evaluation of comercial kit base don acridine orange/propidium iodide to assess the plasma membrane integrity of ram sperm. Span J Agric Res. 2013;11(2):362-365spa
dc.relation.referencesYániz JL, Palacín I, Caycho KS, Soler C, Silvestre MA, Santolaria P. Determining the relationship between bull sperm kinematic subpopulations and fluorescence groups using an integrated sperm quality analysis technique. Reprod Fert Develop. 2018;(30):919-923spa
dc.relation.referencesYoungquist RS, Threlfall WR. 2007. Current therapy in Large Animal Theriogenology. Second edition. Philadelphia, United States: Elsevier.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.identifier.eissn2011-2629
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.22579/20112629.566
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://orinoquia.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/orinoquia/article/download/566/pdf
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 2 , Año 2019spa
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationvolume23spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalOrinoquiaspa
dc.title.translatedConsumption of treated water from oil production in male bovine fertility of the double purpose systemeng
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
Orinoquia-566.pdf2.024Mbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Orinoquia - 2019
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Orinoquia - 2019