Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCollazos-Lasso, Luis F.spa
dc.contributor.authorArias-Castellanos, José A.spa
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T17:41:50Z
dc.date.available2015-01-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-06-13T17:41:50Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.identifier.issn0121-3709
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/2563
dc.description.abstractLos sistemas convencionales de producción piscícola en Colombia empiezan a descender principalmente por la necesidad de grandes cantidades de agua cada vez más escasa, aumento de la contaminación de los afluentes de descargue, aumento del costo de los alimentos con gran desperdicio de los mismos y otros factores ambientales adversos como sequías en grandes áreas del territorio e irregulares volúmenes de producción por unidad de área o volumen. Por lo anterior la búsqueda de nuevas posibilidades de producción piscícola que sean amigables con el ambiente, incluyentes socialmente y rentables son cada vez más apremiantes. Una de las alternativas que empiezan a cautivar el interés de los piscicultores es el sistema de producción súper-intensiva con tecnología biofloc (BFT), la cual se sustenta en aprovechar la acumulación de residuos de los alimentos, materia orgánica y compuestos inorgánicos tóxicos a través de microorganismos presentes en los medios acuáticos, dando condiciones de dominancia a comunidades autótrofas y heterótrofas, resolviendo sustancialmente los problemas de saturación de nutrientes a partir de su reciclaje, en este sentido el objetivo de la presente revisión es presentar los fundamentos básicos de la BFT, como una alternativa de producción piscícola.Palabras clave: Microorganismos; tecnología biofloc; piscicultura; nutrientes.spa
dc.description.abstractConventional systems for fish production in Colombia begin to decline mainly due to the need for large quantities of increasingly scarce water, increasing pollution of the tributaries of discharge, increased cost of food with great waste of these and other factors adverse environmental and droughts in large areas of territory and different volumes of production per unit of area or volume. Therefore the searches for new potential for fish production is environmentally friendly, socially inclusive and profitable are becoming more pressing. One of the alternatives that are beginning to captivate the interest of farmers is the system of super intensive production bioflocs technology (BFT), which is based on the accumulation of waste seize food, organic and inorganic toxic compounds through of microorganisms in aquatic environments, giving dominance conditions and heterotrophic to autotrophi production.Key words: Microorganisms; bioflocs technology; fish production; nutrients.eng
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmlspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de los Llanosspa
dc.rightsOrinoquia - 2016spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://orinoquia.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/orinoquia/article/view/341spa
dc.titleFundamentos de la tecnología biofloc (BFT). Una alternativa para la piscicultura en Colombia. Una revisiónspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal Articleeng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localSección Artículosspa
dc.type.localSección Articleseng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.22579/20112629.341
dc.relation.referencesAbad D, Rincón D, Poleo G. Índices de rendimiento corporal en morocoto Piaractus brachypomus cultivado en sistemas Biofloc. Zootecnia Trop. 2014; 32(2): 119-130.spa
dc.relation.referencesAbreu PC, Ballester ELC, Odebrecht C, Wasielesky WJr, Cavalli RO, Granéli W, Anésio AM. Importance of biofilm as food source for shrimp (Farfantepenaeus paulensis) evaluated by stable isotopes (d13C and d15N). J Expl Mar Biol Ecol. 2007; 347: 88-96.spa
dc.relation.referencesAtencio GV, Pertuz BV, Bru CS, Ayazo GJ. 2013. Curso teórico - práctico tecnología de cultivo biofloc: fundamentos y manejo. Centro de Investigación Piscícola de la Universidad de Córdoba - CINPIC. Montería - Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesAUNAP - Autoridad Nacional de Acuicultura y Pesca. 2013. Diagnóstico del estado de la acuicultura en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesAvnimelech Y. Carbon nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture. 1999; 176: 227-235.spa
dc.relation.referencesAvnimelech Y. Bio-filters: The need for an new comprehensive approach. Aquacult Eng. 2006; 34: 172-178.spa
dc.relation.referencesAvnimelech Y. Feeding with microbial flocs by tilapia in minimal discharge bioflocs technology ponds. Aquaculture. 2007; 264: 140-147.spa
dc.relation.referencesAvnimelech Y. 2009. Biofloc Technology - A practical Guide Book. The World Aquaculture Society. 272 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesAvnimelech Y. 2011. Tilapia Production Using Biofloc Technology Saving Water, Waste Recycling Improves Economics. Global aquaculture advocate May/June: 66-68. USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesAvnimelech Y. 2012a. Nitrogen Isotope: Tool To Evaluate Protein Uptake In Biofloc Systems. Global Aquaculture Alliance. Marzo/Abril 2012. 74-75 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesAvnimelech Y. 2012b. Biofloc Technology - A Pratical Guide Book. The World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States. 2. Ed.spa
dc.relation.referencesAvnimelech Y, Verdegem MCJ, Kurup M, Keshavanath P. Sustainable land-based aquaculture: Rational utilization of water, land and feed resources. Med Aquacult J. 2008; 1: 45-55.spa
dc.relation.referencesAzam F, Fenchel T, Field JG, Gray JS, Meyer-Reil LA, Thingstad F. The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1983; 10: 257-263.spa
dc.relation.referencesAzim ME, Little DC. The biofloc technology (BFT) in indoor tanks: Water quality, biofloc composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture. 2008; 283: 29-35.spa
dc.relation.referencesAzim ME, Little DC, Bron J. Microbial protein production in activated suspension tanks manipulating C:N ratio in feed and implications for fish culture. Bioresour Technol. 2008; 99(9): 3590-3599.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoyd C, Pond water aeration systems. Aquac Eng. 1998; 18: 9-40.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoyd CE, Clay JW. 2002. Evaluation of Belize Aquaculture, Ltd: A Superintensive Shrimp Aquaculture System. Report prepared under the World Bank, NACA, WWF and FAO Consortium Program on Shrimp Farming and the Environment. 17 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrowdy C, Bratvold D, Stokes A, Mcintosh R. 2001. Perspectives on the application of closed shrimp culture systems. In: C.L. Browdy and D.E. Jory, (Eds.) The New Wave, Proceedings of the Special Session on Sustainable Shrimp Culture, Aquaculture The World Aquaculture Society, p. 20-34.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurford MA, Thompson PJ, McIntosh RP, Bauman RH, Pearson DC. Nutrient and microbial dynamics in high-intensity, zero-exchange shrimp ponds in Belize. Aquaculture. 2003; 219: 393-411.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurford MA, Thompson PJ, McIntosh RP, Bauman RH, Pearson DC. The contribution of flocculated material to shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) nutrition in a high-intensity, zero-exchange system. Aquaculture. 2004; 232: 525-537.spa
dc.relation.referencesChamberlain G, Avnimelech Y, McIntosh R, Velasco M. Advantages of aerated microbial reuse systems with balanced C: N. III: practical applications. Global Aqua Advocate. 2001; 4: 50-54.spa
dc.relation.referencesCollazos LLF y Arias CJA. Influencia de la temperatura en la sobrevivencia de larvas de Rhamdia sebae c.f. (Siluriformes heptapteridae). Orinoquia. 2007; 11(1): 56-62.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrab R, Avnimelech Y, Defoirdt T, Bossier P, Verstraete W. Nitrogen removal techniques in aquaculture for a sustainable production. Aquaculture 2007; 270: 1-14.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrab R, Chielens B, Wille M, Bossier P, Verstraete W. The effect of different carbon sources on the nutritional value of bioflocs, a feed for Macrobrachium rosenbergii postlarvae. Aquacult Res. 2010; 41: 559-567.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrab R, Defoirdt T, Bossier P y Verstraete W. Biofloc technology in aquaculture: Beneficial effects and future challenges. Aquaculture. 2012; (356-357): 351-356.spa
dc.relation.referencesCraig LB, Andrew JR, John WL, Avnimelech Y. Biofloc-based Aquaculture Systems. Aquaculture Production Systems, First Edition. Edited by James Tidwell. 2012; 12: 278-306.spa
dc.relation.referencesCraig S, Helfrich LA. 2002. Understanding Fish Nutrition, Feeds and Feeding (Publication 420-256). Virginia Cooperative Extension, Yorktown (Virginia). 4 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavid RCA. 2009. Cuantificación de los niveles de excreción de nitrógeno amoniacal en función del nivel de proteína en la dieta y la masa corporal, en cachama blanca (Piaractus brachypomus) (Cuvier 1818) bajo condiciones de laboratorio. Tesis de maestría en Acuicultura. Universidad de los Llanos, Villavicencio - Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Schryver P, Crab R, Defoirdt T, Boon N, Verstraete W. The basics of bio-flocs technology: The added value for aquaculture. Aquaculture. 2008; 277: 125-137.spa
dc.relation.referencesEbeling JM, Timmons MB, Bisogni JJ. Engineering analysis of the stoichiometry of photoautotrophic, autotrophic and heterotrophic removal of ammonia-nitrogen in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture. 2006; 257: 346-358.spa
dc.relation.referencesEkasari J, Deasy A, Waluyo SH, Bachtiar T, Surawidjaja EH, Bossier P, De Schryver P. The size of biofloc determines the nutritional composition and the nitrogen recovery by aquaculture animals. Aquaculture. 2014; (426-427): 105-111.spa
dc.relation.referencesEkasari J, Rivandi DR, Firdausi AP, Surawidjaja EH, Zairin Jr M, Bossier, De Schryver P. Biofloc technology positively affects Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) larvae performance. Aquaculture. 2015; 441: 72-77.spa
dc.relation.referencesEmerenciano M, Cuzon G, Goguenheim J, Gaxiola G, Aquacop. Floc contribution on spawning performance of blue shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris. Aquac Res. 2012; 44(1): 75-85.spa
dc.relation.referencesEmerenciano M, Gaxiola G y Cuzon G. 2013. Biofloc Technology (BFT): A Review for Aquaculture Application and Animal Food Industry. INTECH open science_open minds. Cap 12: 301-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/53902.spa
dc.relation.referencesEmerson K, Russo RC, Lund RE, Thurston RV. Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: effect of pH and temperature. J Fish Res Board Can. 1975; 32: 2379-2383.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO - Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la alimentación y la agricultura. 2012. El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura. Roma.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO - Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la alimentación y la agricultura. 2014. El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura. Roma.spa
dc.relation.referencesGelineau A, Medale F. y Boujard T. Effect of feeding time on post prandial nitrogen excretion and energy expenditure in rainbow trout. J Fish Biol. 1998; 52: 655-664.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreen BW. Performance of a temperate-zone channel Cat fish biofloc technology production system during winter. Aquacultural Engineering. 2015; 64: 60-67.spa
dc.relation.referencesHargreaves JA. Nitrogen biogeochemistry of aquaculture ponds. Review. Aquaculture. 1998. 166 181-212.spa
dc.relation.referencesHargreaves JA. Photosynthetic suspended-growth systems in aquaculture. Aquacult Eng. 2006; 34: 344-363.spa
dc.relation.referencesHargreaves JA. Bioflóc Production Systems for Aquaculture. En: SRAC. Abril, 2013: 4503: 8-10.spa
dc.relation.referencesHari B, Kurup BM, Varghese JT, Schrama JW, Verdegem MCJ. Effects of carbohydrate addition on production in extensive shrimp culture systems. Aquaculture. 2004; 241: 179-194.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández J, Vargas AF. A microplate technique to quantify nutrients (NO2=, NO3=, NH4+ and PO43-) in seawater. Aquac Res. 2003; 34: 1201-1204.spa
dc.relation.referencesJorand F, Zartarian F, Thomas F, Block J, Bottero J, Villemin G, Urbain V, Manem J. Chemical and structural (2d) linkage between bacteria within activated-sludge flocs. Water Res. 1995; 29(7): 1639-1647.spa
dc.relation.referencesKubitza F. Criação de tilapias em sistema com bioflocos sem renovação de agua. Panorama da Aqüicultura. 2011; 21(125): 14-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuhn D, Lawrence A. 2012. Biofloc Technology Options For Aquaculture In-Situ, Ex-Situ Systems Improve Water Quality, Provide Nutrition. Copyright © 2012, Global Aquaculture Alliance.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuhn D, Boardman G, Lawrence A, Marsh L, Flick G. Microbial floc meal as a replacement ingredient for fish meal and soybean protein in shrimp feed. Aquaculture. 2009; 296: 51-57.spa
dc.relation.referencesMartínez CLR, Martínez PM, López EJA, Campaña TCA, Miranda BA, Ballester E, Porchas CMA, Martínez-Córdova L. 2010. Alimento Natural en Acuacultura: una revisión actualizada. En: Cruz-Suarez LE, Ricque-Marie D, Tapia-Salazar M, Nieto-López MG, Villarreal-Cavazos DA, Gamboa-Delgado J. (Eds). Avances en nutrición Acuícola X - Memorias del X Simposio Internacional de Alimento natural en acuacultura: Nutrición Acuícola, 8-10 de Noviembre, San Nicolás de los Garza, N. L., México. ISBN 978-607-433-546-0. Univ Autó Nvo León, Monterrey, México, pp. 668-699.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcintosh R, 2001. Changing Paradigms in Shrimp Farming. V: Establishment of heterotrofic bacterial commuinities. Global Aquaculture Alliance. v. February.spa
dc.relation.referencesMonroy DMC, De Lara AR, Castro MJ, Castro MG y Emerenciano CM. Composición y abundancia de comunidades microbianas. Rev Biol Mar Oceanogr. 2013; 48(3): 511-520.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoss S. 2002. Dietary importance of microbes and detritus in penaeid shrimp aquaculture, pp. 1-18. In: Microbial Approaches to Aquatic Nutrition within Environmentally Sound Aquaculture Production Systems, CS Lee and P. O'Bryen (editors). The World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisisana, USA, 2002.spa
dc.relation.referencesOkabe S, Watanabe Y. Structure and function of growth culture evaluation of Daphnia magna feed with Saccharomyces cereviseae enrichment with oat soy nitrifying biofilms as determined by in situ hybridization and the presence of microelectrodes. Water Sci Technol. 2000; 42: 21-32.spa
dc.relation.referencesPasco MJ. 2005. Aeraçãoem cultivos superintensivos de tilapias Oreochromis niloticus, em bioflocos e com troca mínima de água. Tese Doutorado em aquicultura. Universidade Federal De Santa Catarina, Centro De Ciências Agrárias Departamento De Aquicultura, Florianapolis. Brasil.spa
dc.relation.referencesPiedrahita RH. Reducing the potential environmental impact of tank aquaculture effluents through intensification and recirculation. Aquaculture. 2003; 226: 35-44.spa
dc.relation.referencesPoleo G, Aranbarrio JV, Mendoza L, Romero O. Cultivo de cachama blanca en altas densidades y en dos sistemas cerrados. Pesq Agropec Bras. Brasília. 2011; 46(4): 429-437.spa
dc.relation.referencesPoli MA, Schveitzer R, Oliveira N. The use of biofloc technology in a South American catfish (Rhamdia quelen) hatchery: Effect of suspended solids in the performance of larvae. Aquacult Eng. 2015; 66: 17-21.spa
dc.relation.referencesRay AJ, Seaborn G, Leffler JW, Wilde SB, Lawson A, Browdy CL. Characterization of microbial communities in minimal-exchange, intensive aquaculture systems and the effects of suspended solids management. Aquaculture. 2010; 310: 130-138.spa
dc.relation.referencesRay JA, Lotz JM. Comparing a chemoautotrophic-based biofloc system and three heterotrophic-based systems receiving different carbohydrate sources. Aquacult Eng. 2014; 63: 54-61.spa
dc.relation.referencesSagratzki CBA, Pereira-Filho M, Bordinhon A, Fonseca FA, Ituassú D, Roubach R. y Ono EA. Tolerância de juvenis de pirarucuao aumento da concentração de amôniaem ambiente confinado. Pesq Agrop Bras. 2004; 39: 513-516.spa
dc.relation.referencesSamocha TM, Patnaik S, Speed M, Ali AM, Burger JM, Almeida RV, Ayub Z, Harisanto M, Horowitz A, Brock DL. Use of molasses as carbon source in limited discharge nursery and grow-out systems for Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquacult Eng. 2007; 36: 184-191.spa
dc.relation.referencesSastre OF, Hernández G, Cruz CP. Influencia del peso corporal y de la temperatura del agua sobre el consumo de oxígeno de la Cachama Blanca (Piaractus brachypomus). Rev Col Cienc Pec. 2004; 17: 11-16.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchneider O, Sereti V, Eding EP y Verreth JAJ. Molasses as C source for heterotrophic bacteria production on solid fish waste. Aquaculture. 2006; 261: 1239-1248.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchveitzer R, Arantes R, Costódio PFS, do Espírito Santo CM, Arana LV, Seiffert WQ, Andreatta ER, Effect of different biofloc levels on microbial activity, water quality and performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in a tank system operated with no water exchange. Aquacult Eng. 2013; 56: 59-70.spa
dc.relation.referencesTimmons MB, Ebeling JM, Wheaton FW, Sommerfelt ST, Vinci BJ. 2002. Microbial biofloc and protein levels in green tiger shrimp. Recirculating aquaculture systems, 748 pp. Caruga Aqua Ventures, New York.spa
dc.relation.referencesTimmons MB, Ebeling JM, Wheaton FW, Summerrfelt ST, Vinci BJ. 2002a. Recirculating aquaculture systems. 2 ed. New York: Cayuga Aqua Venture, 769 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesTimmons MB y Ebeling JM. 2010. Recirculating Aquaculture. NRAC Publication No. 401. Ithaca, NY, 948 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesTzachi M, Samocha BA, Correia ES, Morris TC, Wilkenfeld JS. 2012. Growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in super-intensive mixotrophic raceway culture with zero discharge using Tareation® technology for aeration and extended CO2 degassing. Texas AgriLife Research Mariculture Lab. at Flour Bluff, Corpus Christi, Texas. 45 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesValbuena M, Velasco SY, Cruz CP. Efecto del peso corporal sobre el consumo de oxígeno en yamú (Brycon amazonicus Spix & Agassiz 1829): reporte preliminar. Rev Col Cienc Pec. 2006; 19(2): 175-179.spa
dc.relation.referencesValbuena RD, Cruz CP. Efecto del peso corporal y temperatura del agua sobre el consumo de oxígeno de tilapia roja (Oreochromis sp). Orinoquia. 2006; 10(1): 57-63.spa
dc.relation.referencesVinatea L. 2004. Principios químicos de qualidade da agua em aqüicultura. 2. ed: Editora da UFSC, Florianópolis 345 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesWasielesky WJr, Atwood H, Stokes A, Browdy CL. Effect of natural production in a zero exchange suspended microbial floc based super-intensive culture system for white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2006; 258: 396-403.spa
dc.relation.referencesWHO - World Health Organization technical report. 2003. series Nº 916.150 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilén BM, Onuki M, Hermansson M, Lumley D, Mino T. Microbial community structure in activated sludge floc analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and its relation to floc stability. Water Research, 2008; 42(8-9): 2300-2308.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.identifier.eissn2011-2629
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.22579/20112629.341
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://orinoquia.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/orinoquia/article/download/341/934
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://orinoquia.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/orinoquia/article/download/341/pdf_33
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 1 , Año 2015spa
dc.relation.citationendpage86
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage77
dc.relation.citationvolume19spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalOrinoquiaspa
dc.title.translatedFundamentals of bioflocs technology (BFT). An alternative for fish farming in Colombia. A revieweng
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
Orinoquia-341.pdf180.1Kbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Orinoquia - 2016
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Orinoquia - 2016