Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorOsejo-Bucheli, Camilospa
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-17 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T17:27:57Z
dc.date.available2022-01-17 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-06-13T17:27:57Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-17
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/1938
dc.description.abstractProblemática: las perspectivas epistemológicas de la investigación en gestión, al igual que las de cualquier disciplina, deben revisarse constantemente para identificar oportunidades de avance teórico. La mayoría de las escuelas de gestión en Latinoamérica se suscriben a la corriente de la gestión humanista. La administración de operaciones, siendo un componente del currículo, se origina en una corriente epistemológica diferente. El punto de partida de este artículo es la tensión entre las dos corrientes epistemológicas. Objetivos: confrontar las perspectivas epistemológicas de la investigación en gestión existentes en el currículo de gestión humanista desde sus propios principios y, a partir de esa confrontación, proponer nuevas perspectivas epistemológicas. Materiales y métodos: se usa la exégesis textual para la recolección de la información. También se usa la dialéctica hegeliana, mediante el método de la crítica inmanente, para construir sobre tesis, antítesis y síntesis. Resultados: el artículo encuentra posibles perspectivas epistemológicas de la investigación en gestión y las presenta en lo ontológico, epistemológico y metodológico. Encuentra oportunidades con respecto a lo ontológico en los estudios del proceso y la teoría de sistemas. En cuanto a lo epistemológico, en la historia, la multidisciplinariedad, la territorialidad y la cibernética. En lo metodológico, en los estudios multidisciplinares, los métodos de la filosofía y el panexperiencialismo. Discusión: el artículo aborda la discusión del significado de un estudio humanista y de las humanidades en la investigación en gestión. Conclusiones: existe la necesidad de explorar nuevas posiciones filosóficas en la investigación en gestión desde las definiciones iniciales. Contribución / originalidad: el estudio discute una de las vertientes más relevantes en la epistemología de la investigación en gestión en Latinoamérica.spa
dc.description.abstractProblem: The epistemological perspectives in management research, as well as in any discipline, must be constantly reviewed to identify opportunities for theoretical advancement. Most management schools in Latin-America subscribe to the humanistic management epistemology, yet operations management, being a part management curricula, identifies with positivism. The starting point of this article is the tension between the two epistemologies in management. Objective: to confront the two seemingly antagonistic epistemological perspectives in management research, coexistent in the humanist management curriculum. Reflecting from the humanistic first principles, to propose new epistemological perspectives. Materials and methods: The article uses textual exegesis for data collection, and Hegelian dialectics applying the method of immanent critique, building on, theses-antithesis- synthesis for data analisys. Results: The article finds possible epistemological perspectives for management research, and presents them in the ontological, epistemological, and methodological levels. It finds research opportunities regarding ontology, in process studies, and systems theory. Regarding epistemology, it finds opportunities in the study of history, multidisciplinary studies, territoriality, and cybernetics. Methodologically it unveils opportunities for research in the application of the methods of philosophy, and panexperientialism. Discussion: The study discusses the meaning of humanities in management studies. Conclusions: The need to explore new philosophical positions in management research from the initial definitions. Contribution/originality: This study discusses one of the relevant epistemological perspectives in Latin-American management.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmlspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de los Llanosspa
dc.rightsCamilo Osejo-Bucheli - 2022spa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistageon.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/geon/article/view/766spa
dc.subjectBinderseng
dc.subjectmeat cutseng
dc.subjectrestructured meateng
dc.subjectligantesspa
dc.subjectaglutinantesspa
dc.subjectrecortes de carnespa
dc.subjectcarne reestructuradaspa
dc.titleHallazgos epistemológicos en la investigación en gestión aplicando la crítica inmanente, desde el humanismo al currículo humanistaspa
dc.typeArtículo de Reflexiónspa
dc.typeReflection Articleeng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localSección Artículo de reflexiónspa
dc.type.localSección Reflection articleeng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.identifier.doi10.22579/23463910.766
dc.relation.referencesAaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151897spa
dc.relation.referencesAktouf, O. (2002). El Simbolismo y la “Cultura Organizacional” De los abusos conceptuales a las lecciones de campo. AD-minister, (1), 63-93. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7024461spa
dc.relation.referencesAktouf, O. & Holford, W. (2009). The implications of humanism for business studies. En H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan & E. Von Kimakowitz (Eds.), Humanism in Business (pp. 101-122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808395.008spa
dc.relation.referencesAktouf, O., Chenoufi, M. & Holford, W. (2005). The False Expectations of Michael Porter's Strategic Management Framework. Problems and Perspectives in Management 3(4), 181-200. https://acortar.link/WkiX7Nspa
dc.relation.referencesAllen, M. R. D. (2019). God, Ontology and Management: A Philosophical Praxis. Philosophy of Management 18(3), 303-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-018-0101-6spa
dc.relation.referencesAntonio, R. J. (1981). Immanent Critique as the Core of Critical Theory: Its Origins and Developments in Hegel, Marx and Contemporary Thought. The British Journal of Sociology, 32(3), 330-345. https://doi.org/10.2307/589281spa
dc.relation.referencesAppadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization (Vol. 1). University of Minnesota Press. https://acortar.link/ThZL3Dspa
dc.relation.referencesArciniega García, L. (2019). Humanismo y Germanías: la decoración del palacio condal de Oliva11. Hispanic Research Journal, 20(5), 451-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682737.2019.1734341spa
dc.relation.referencesArnould, E. J. & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868-882. https://doi.org/10.1086/426626spa
dc.relation.referencesAudi, R. (1999). Diccionario Akal de Filosofía. Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeer, S. (1984). The Viable System Model: Its Provenance, Development, Methodology and Pathology. J Oper Res Soc, 35(1), 7–25 https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1984.2spa
dc.relation.referencesBarnard, C. I. (1968). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press. https://bit.ly/3toWxPmspa
dc.relation.referencesBooth, C. & Rowlinson, M. (2006). Management and organizational history: Prospects. Management & Organizational History, 1(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935906060627 Brockmeyer, E., Halstrøm, H., Jensen, A. & Erlang, A. (1948). The Life and Works of A.K. Erlang. University of Michigan.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrunet, M., Fachin, F. & Langley, A. (2021). Studying Projects Processually. International Journal of Project Management, 39(8), 834-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.10.006.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurrell, G. & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Heinemann Educational Books. https://acortar.link/sApQdyspa
dc.relation.referencesChanlat, A. & Bedard, R. (1991). Managing in the Quebec style: originality and vulnerability. International Studies of Management & Organization, 21(3), 10-37.spa
dc.relation.referencesChanlat, A. & Soto, B. M. (1996 ). El oficio del dirigente: ¿“gran empresario” o “buen dirigente”? Cuadernos de Administración, 15(23), 111-118.spa
dc.relation.referencesCook, A., Blom, H., Lillo, F., Nunzio, R., Miccichè, S., Rivas, D., Vázquez, R. & Zanin, M. (2015). Applying complexity science to air traffic management. Journal of Air Transport Management, 42, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.09.011spa
dc.relation.referencesDantzig, G. (1982). Reminiscences about the origins of linear programming. Operations Research Letters, 1(2), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6377(82)90043-8spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Courcelles, D. (2019). La divulgación humanista de los saberes: lo que el viento se llevó. Desde Pedro Mexía a Michel de Montaigne en la Europa del siglo XVI. Hipogrifo, 7(2), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.13035/H.2019.07.02.30spa
dc.relation.referencesDesmond, M. (2012). On Not knowing Greek: Leonzio Pilatus's Rendition of the Iliad and the Translatio of Mediterranean Identities. En E. Campbell & R. Mills (Eds.), Rethinking Medieval Translation: Ethics, Politics, Theory (pp. 21-40). Boydell and Brewer.spa
dc.relation.referencesDurant, W. (1953). The Renaissance. The Story of Civilization: Part V. Simon & Schuster.spa
dc.relation.referencesDurugbo, C. M., Anouze, A. L., Amoudi, O. & Al-Balushi, Z. (2021). Competitive priorities for regional operations: a Delphi study. Production Planning & Control, 32(15), 1295-1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1805809spa
dc.relation.referencesDussel, E. (2013). Filosofía de la liberación – Obras selectas XI – (1.a ed.). Docencia. https://www.enriquedussel.com/txt/Textos_Obras_Selectas/(F)11.Fillosofia_liberacion.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesEasterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., Jackson, P. & Jaspersen, L. J. (2018). Management & Business Research (6.a ed.). SAGE.spa
dc.relation.referencesEriksson, D. & Engström, A. (2021). Using critical realism and abduction to navigate theory and data in operations and supply chain management research. Supply Chain Management, 26(2), 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2020-0091spa
dc.relation.referencesErlang, A. (1909). The Theory of Probabilities and Telephone Conversations. Nyt. Tidsskr. Mat. Ser. B, 20, 33-39. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3M9HQYSspa
dc.relation.referencesFayol, H., Coubrough, J. A. & International Management Institute. (1930). Industrial and General Administration. Translated by J.A. Coubrough. Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons.spa
dc.relation.referencesFollet, M. P. (1918). The New State. University Park: Penn State Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesFrosh, S. & Emerson, P. D. (2005). Interpretation and over-interpretation: disputing the meaning of texts. Qualitative Research, 5(3), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105054457spa
dc.relation.referencesGarud, R., Jarzabkowski, P., Langley, A., Tsoukas, H., Van de Ven, A. & Lê, J. (2020). "Process Research Methods: A Conversation among Leading Scholars*". En Crook, T.R., Lê, J. & Smith, A.D. (Eds.), Advancing Methodological Thought and Practice (vol. 12, pp. 117-132). Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-838720200000012019spa
dc.relation.referencesGeels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8spa
dc.relation.referencesGeraldi, J., Maylor, H. & Williams, T. (2011). Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31(9), 966-990. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111165848spa
dc.relation.referencesGilbreth, F. & Gilbreth, L. M. (1917). Applied motion study a collection of papers on the efficient method to industrial preparedness. Sturgis & Walton Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesGilbreth, F. B. (1909). Bricklaying system. The MC Clark Publishing Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesGilbreth, F. B. & Kent, R. T. (1911). Motion study: a method for increasing the efficiency of the workman. D. Van Nostrand Company.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzáles-Miranda, D. R. & Rojas-Rojas, W. (2020). Editorial. Repensando la crítica en los estudios organizacionales. Innovar, 30(78), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n78.90295spa
dc.relation.referencesGrassl, W. & Habisch, A. (2011). Ethics and economics: Towards a New Humanistic Synthesis for Business. J Bus Ethics, 99(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0747-7spa
dc.relation.referencesHavu, K. (2019). Ethos, authority and worldly reputation in the Erasmian Republic of Letters. Renaissance Studies, 33(5), 789-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/rest.12543spa
dc.relation.referencesHegel, G. W. F. (2014). Science of logic. Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesHolmström, J., Hameri, A.-P. & Ketokivi, M. (2006). Operations management as a problem-solving discipline. Proceedings, B1-B6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2006.27175141 https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/articles-85932_archivo_pdf.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesInternational Federation of Operational Research Societies. (2020, 12 de abril). What is OR. https://www.ifors.org/what-is-or/spa
dc.relation.referencesInternational Humanistic Management Association. (2020, 12 de noviembre). Art for Humanizing Management Seminar with Dr. Jyoti Bachani [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFxtdb-iEGE&t=2131sspa
dc.relation.referencesJackson, T. (2002). Reframing human resource management in Africa: A cross-cultural perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(7), 998-1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190210131267spa
dc.relation.referencesKast, F. E. & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1972). General Systems Theory: Applications for Organization and Management. AMJ, 15(4), 447-465. https://doi.org/10.5465/255141spa
dc.relation.referencesKozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935spa
dc.relation.referencesLee, S., Lovelace, K. & Manz, C. (2014). Serving with spirit: An integrative model of workplace spirituality within service organizations. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 11(1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2013.801023spa
dc.relation.referencesLobato Calleros, O., Chanlat, A., Bédard, R. & Ramírez, G. (2014). Autopietic decisions approach: a governance research network case study. The TQM Journal, 26(4), 382-394. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2014-0011spa
dc.relation.referencesLuhmann, N. (2017). Evolution of science. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201752240spa
dc.relation.referencesMarkov, A. (1971). Extension of the limit theorems of probability theory to a sum of variables connected in a chain. John Wiley and Sons.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarsh, D. (2013). Cicero in the Renaissance. En Steel, C. (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero (pp. 306 - 317). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139048750.020spa
dc.relation.referencesMayo, E. (1934). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. Nature, 134, 201. https://www.nature.com/articles/134201b0spa
dc.relation.referencesMelé, D. (2003a). The Challenge of Humanistic Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023298710412spa
dc.relation.referencesMelé, D. (2003b). Organizational Humanizing Cultures: Do They Generate Social Capital? Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1/2), 3-14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25075051spa
dc.relation.referencesMeredith, J.R., Raturi, A., Amoako-Gyampah, K. & Kaplan, B. (1989). Alternative research paradigms in operations. Journal of Operations Management, 8(4), 297-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(89)90033-8spa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación. (2003, 13 de noviembre). Resolución número 2767 de 2003. Por la cual se definen las características específicas de calidad para los programas de pregrado en Administración.spa
dc.relation.referencesMonreal Pérez, J. L. (2011). Juan Luis Vives, lengua y lenguaje en el humanismo renacentista. Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía, 28, 101-133. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev-ASHF.2011.v28.36281spa
dc.relation.referencesMontaño Hirose, L. (2020). Encrucijadas y desafíos de los Estudios Organizacionales Una reflexión desde las perspectivas institucionales. Innovar, 30(78), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n78.90304spa
dc.relation.referencesMünsterberg, H. (1913). Psychologie und Wirtschaftsleben. The Riverside Cambridge. Nadworny, M. (1957). Frederick Taylor and Frank Gilbreth: Competition in Scientific Management. Business History Review, 31(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3111727spa
dc.relation.referencesOsejo-Bucheli , C. (2021b). Hacia una filosofía de la administración centrada en el carácter. Revista de Filosofía, Centro de Estudios Filosóficos "Dr. Adolfo García Díaz", facultad de Humanidades y Educación, Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo – Venezuela, 38(98), 715-743. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5528973spa
dc.relation.referencesOsejo-Bucheli, C. (2021a). Demostración lógica sobre coherencia de filosofía de la ciencia y métodos cualitativos de investigaciónen gestión. Revista Educación En Ingeniería, 16(32), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.26507/rei.v16n32.1191spa
dc.relation.referencesOsejo-Bucheli, C. (2022a). Globalization fractal effect: theory testing through macro-ethnographic observation of deterritorialization in Colombian social uprisings [working paper].spa
dc.relation.referencesOsejo-Bucheli, C. (2022b). Theory evaluation and formulation: a reply to Ludic Theory through A.N.Whitehead´s Aesthetic Experience. Philosophy of Management, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00194-4spa
dc.relation.referencesParello, V. (2008). The anti-Jewish apologetics of Juan Luis Vives (1543). Between faith and reason. Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez, 38(2), 171-187+322+318+314. https://doi.org/10.4000/mcv.3959spa
dc.relation.referencesPareto, V. (1916). Trattato di sociologia generale (vol. 1). Firenze: G. Barbera, Editore. https://archive.org/details/ParetoTrattatoDiSociologiaGeneraleVol1/mode/2upspa
dc.relation.referencesPascal, B. (1852). pensées. Dezobry et E. Magdeleine.spa
dc.relation.referencesPirson, M. & Lawrence, P. R. (2010). Humanism in Business - Towards a Paradigm Shift? J Bus Ethics, 93, 553-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0239-1spa
dc.relation.referencesPirson, M. & Malhotra, D. (2011). Foundations of Organizational Trust: What Matters to Different Stakeholders? Organization Science, 22(4), 1087-1104. https://doi.org/10.2307/20868912spa
dc.relation.referencesPirson, M., Bachani, J. & Blomme, R. J. (2018). Humanistic Management: Social Entrepreneurship and Mindfulness, Volume II: Foundations, Cases, and Exercises. Business Expert Press. https://digitalcommons.stmarys-ca.edu/school-economics-business-faculty-works/484/spa
dc.relation.referencesPrat, S. (2017). La réception des Académiques dans les Essais: une manière voisine et inavouée de faire usage du doute sceptique. En: Smith, P. & Charles S. (Eds.), Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées (vol 221). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45424-5_2spa
dc.relation.referencesPrelinger Archives. (2021, 06 de marzo). Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/prelingerspa
dc.relation.referencesReed, M. (2006). Organizational Theorizing: A Historically Contested Terrain. En S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy & T. B. Lawrence, The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 19-54). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608030.n2spa
dc.relation.referencesRogers, C. R. (1942). Counseling and psychotherapy; newer concepts in practice. Houghton Mifflin. Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., & Wilson, J. (2012). Business research methods. Financial Times (6.a ed.). FT Prentice Hall.spa
dc.relation.referencesSavitski, S. (2019). Idleness and freedom in Michel de Montaigne’s “essays”. Philosophical Literary Journal Logos, 29(1), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2019-1-189-200spa
dc.relation.referencesShewhart, W. (1931). Economic control of quality of manufactured product. Van Nostrand.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, J. H. (1998 ). The Enduring Legacy of Elton Mayo. Human Relations, 51(3), 221-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679805100302spa
dc.relation.referencesSpitzeck, H., Pirson, M., Amann, W. Khan, S., von Kimakowitz, E. (Eds.) (2009). Humanism in business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSteinberg, J. (2020). Politics as a model of pedagogy in Spinoza. Ethics and Education, 15(2), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2020.1731657spa
dc.relation.referencesSteiner, G. (2013, 22 de febrero). Universitas? [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyAqh4-18nQ Swann, T. & Stoborod, K. (2014). Did you hear the one about the anarchist manager? Ephimera, 14(4), 591-609. https://bit.ly/3hvGlpNspa
dc.relation.referencesSwann, T. R. (2016). Anarchist Cybernetics: Control and Communication in Radical Left Social Movements (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester).spa
dc.relation.referencesSwann, T. (2017). Information, cybernetics and the second industrial revolution. Ephemera, 17(2), 457. https://bit.ly/35p6vIvspa
dc.relation.referencesSwann, T. (2018). Towards an anarchist cybernetics: Stafford Beer, self-organisation and radical social movements. Ephemeta Theory & Politics in Organization, 18(3), 427-456. https://bit.ly/3tqwHKGspa
dc.relation.referencesSwann, T. (2020). Anarchist Cybernetics: Control and Communication in Radical Politics. Policy Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, F. W. (1903). Shop management, by Frederick Winslow Taylor, with an introduction by Henry R. Towne. Harper & Brothers Publishers. http://www.public-library.uk/pdfs/8/290.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper & Brothers Publishers.spa
dc.relation.referencesTaylor, F. & Fayol, H. (1981). Principios de la administración científica. Ateneo. https://bit.ly/3Mgzsqrspa
dc.relation.referencesTead, O. (1929). Human Nature and Management: The applications of Psychology to Executive Leadership. McGraw Hill. https://bit.ly/3Hznchuspa
dc.relation.referencesTowill, D. R. (2010). Industrial engineering the Toyota Production System. Journal of Management History, 16(3), 327-345. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511341011051234spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Fraassen, B. C. (1985). 11. Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science. En Churchland, P. M. & Hooker, C. A., Images of science: Essays on realism and empiricism, with a reply from Bas C. van Fraassen. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://acortar.link/ve54Cvspa
dc.relation.referencesVarela, E. (2018). La Hegemonía del Management. Una genealogía del poder managerial. Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolivar.spa
dc.relation.referencesVives, J. L. (1525). Introductio ad sapientiam (introducción a la sabiduría). Lovaina. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1972). The History and Status of General Systems Theory. AMJ, 15(4), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.5465/255139spa
dc.relation.referencesWhitehead, A. N. (1919). The Concept of Nature. The Tarner Lectures Delivered in Trinity College November 1919. Dover Publications, INC. https://acortar.link/NeSnqrspa
dc.relation.referencesWhitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality, an essay in cosmology. The Free Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhitehead, T. N. (1938). The Industrial Worker: A Statistical Study of Human Relations in a Group of Manual Workers, Volume II. Harvard University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhitehead, T. N. (2013). Leadership in a free society: A Study in Human Relations Based on an Analysis of Present-Day Industrial Civilization. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674593725spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.identifier.eissn2346-3910
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.22579/23463910.766
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistageon.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/geon/article/download/766/874
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistageon.unillanos.edu.co/index.php/geon/article/download/766/875
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 1 , Año 2022 : Revista Geon Vol 9 No 1 enero junio 2022spa
dc.relation.citationendpage766
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationvolume9spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista GEON (Gestión, Organizaciones y Negocios)spa
dc.title.translatedEpistemological findings in management research applying immanient critique, from humanism to the humanistic curriculumeng
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer
Rev. Geon-766.pdf1.561Mbapplication/pdfVer/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Camilo Osejo-Bucheli - 2022
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Camilo Osejo-Bucheli - 2022